#21
|
|||
|
Any info out there on DPS output warrior vs SK?
| ||
|
#22
|
|||
|
SK's also get chunked in pve compared to monk and warrior, however, they are fun in small group xp situations as they are great pullers
| ||
|
#23
|
|||
|
Depends on your starting budget. An ungeared warrior is virulent ass cancer until level 52, when you get evasive discipline and suddenly are 1) a god 2) have an ability beyond auto-attack-taunt-kick
Leveling to 52, I often envied the hybrids who could cast spells and had some utility. But equip your warrior with enough twink gear and travel helping tools and it will be more fun through and through i bet. | ||
|
#24
|
|||
|
If you play on blue (you do) there is no reason to ever make a paladin or an sk
| ||
|
#25
|
|||
|
Warriors can be really gear/group dependent while SKs are more versatile and can make up for a lack of platinum with their incredibly diverse kit. I had a lot more fun leveling my SKs than warriors, but maybe that's because I prefer the safety of a spell bar and often find myself soloing.
| ||
|
#26
|
|||
|
SK/Pal aggro spells get better later on because the amount of aggro they do is dependent on mob HP.
| ||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
Because you like it.... I have a 60 Warrior and a 60 Paladin and my Paladin is my main. I just really like hybrids, as powerful as Warriors are. That being said, Paladins have way more group and raid utility than an SK lpl. How does anyone even say that? SKs are designed to be more self sufficient but offer very little in a group or raid environment
__________________
| |||
|
#28
|
|||
|
Warrior is very not fun to level if you aren't twinked out / have friends to level with.
| ||
|
#29
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|