Banned toxic players cry about server staff. Silent majority thanks GMs

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Tentarro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You immediately went for the semantics angle because you have fuck all to say.

Originally Posted by Tentarro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I brought it up as #2

Semantics.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

www.nytimes.com/2016/02/29/world/americas/a-chilean-ex-soldier-guiltily-recalls-his-units-atrocities.amp.html

As an 18-year-old soldier in the Chilean Army in 1973, Mr. Padilla was on patrol with his unit in a southern city when the owner of a supermarket turned in his own son, accusing him of supplying munitions and food to a guerrilla group. The soldiers threw the young man into a well and began shooting at him. Then they dragged out his bloody, bullet-riddled body, put it in a military truck and drove off. Mr. Padilla was watching from a nearby jeep.

“I never knew where he was taken, and not even his name,” he said.

[Nirgon]

@lulz

https://youtu.be/ZtAHGZffoLI

[Tentarro]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Semantics.

Retard.

Imagine being killed after a coup because you supplied the enemy.

[Ennewi]

It was your second point, but the point was first made by you and in the same post, a few backspaces and it would have been in the same sentence. But if you want to be so anal about it, neither of those posts immediately went for the semantics angle.

Originally Posted by Tentarro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Article with no sources, a lack of proofreading

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, loose instead of lose. Credibility undercut entirely.

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry, but that typo means in order to be logically consistent you support extrajudicial killings now.

12-16 minutes after the fact, Biff Tannentarro. RNF almost needs its own UN for all of this petty squabbling over details.

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Tentarro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Retard.



Imagine being killed after a coup because you supplied the enemy.

Allegedly. Where's your proof it happened in that one instance? Articles. Sources. Alarti.

[Tentarro]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It was your second point, but the point was first made by you and in the same post, a few backspaces and it would have been in the same sentence. But if you want to be so anal about it, neither of those posts immediately went for the semantics angle.







12-16 minutes after the fact, Biff Tannentarro. RNF almost needs its own UN for all of this petty squabbling over details.

They literally did go for the semantics angle, do you know what semantics mean?

[Tentarro]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Allegedly. Where's your proof it happened in that one instance? Articles. Sources. Alarti.

You're right, allegedly. They simply have a picture of possibly a Chilean man that might've been around in Pinochet's reign, there's no verbal interview, who knows if those are his words?

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Tentarro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They literally did go for the semantics angle, do you know what semantics mean?

Language. Meaning. Definition. Expressions. Colloquialisms. Etymology. Linguistics.

Do you know what immediately means?

[Shadeynight]

This thread has ascended.