|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
said the sarnak
__________________
| ||
|
#153
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=seananetsberger;2909813Bg accepts the punishment from llandris. We should not of killed it. Hence why we conceded 2 sev as soon as we found out.
[/QUOTE] If you accept the punishment then why are you crying over the lost Scales. Deleted loot is the punishment. | ||
|
#154
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Can you wrap your head around that? Quote:
Quote:
Imagine a world where BG gets a Vulak they should have DQ'd themselves from. Do you think conceding the next two Vulaks would be a just punishment? Of course not, because they aren't giving up anything. They never had a chance at those next two Vulaks anyway. Conceding mobs only makes sense in a raid environment that has two guilds. | |||||
|
#156
|
|||
|
Tampooooooooooooon!!
| ||
|
#157
|
|||
|
That’s some seriously disrespectful shade you’re throwing there. Why the personal attacks? And who are you, anyway?
Lavittz is very personable and well-spoken. So uh, you’re wrong, I guess. LOOOOLROFLIMGADZPWNEDLULZNEWB - there, had to stoop down a bit to maybe get a message across.
__________________
P1999 Blue: Relent Less - 60 Bard ; Red: Shifty - 24 Druid
Formerly: Toomuch Twohandle 65 Ranger on Sullon Zek | ||
|
#158
|
|||
|
Don't let the catfish bait you Relent!!! He clearly needs to be justified by teh forum trolls that he knows what he's talking about!!
__________________
Your Friendly Neighborhood Druid of the 60th Season
Core-Officer of Azure Guard, /Salute | ||
|
#159
|
|||
|
Oh, and Lavittz DID come to an agreement with Aegis. That agreement was broken by certain controlling parties within Aegis, literally because their attempt at extortion failed
Why in the world would ALs have any claim to the loot? Was the proposal “hey, we know you should have been DQ’d, but seeing as 2 green scales dropped, and we shouldn’t take it from you in the first place because of our guild charter, we’d be OK breaking our guild charter AND collecting DQ loot.” What the hell kind of ass-backwards logic is that?! I’ve got friends in like every guild in Aegis, so I really hope I’m not burning bridges here, but that line of reasoning is just bat-shit crazy, and it also goes against the precedent that has been set of self-regulating/policing. And all for a green scale that by their own admission (in submitting the petition) would be DQ loot, AND against the ALS charter to accept. That’s just dirty. W T F Where is this coming from?! Have we overlapped on about 75 too many raid targets or something? I’m just baffled here. It makes no damn sense.
__________________
P1999 Blue: Relent Less - 60 Bard ; Red: Shifty - 24 Druid
Formerly: Toomuch Twohandle 65 Ranger on Sullon Zek | ||
|
|
|