Martial Law in the new world order?

[mmmroo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHq433BAjVM

Crazy times this AUMF

thoughts?

[iruinedyourday]

Another one for the list!

[AzzarTheGod]

Some Dems still have a pulse. Pras.

[mmmroo]

I am confused.

[mmmroo]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some Dems still have a pulse. Pras.

Translation into English please?

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some Dems still have a pulse. Pras.

Yeah, a heartbeat is requisite for convincing theater. Otherwise you wind up with the automatons from Splash Mountain (or a Romney type politician).

Seemed like some decent rhetoric on limitation of war-powers, which I am all about under normal circumstances, but embedded is a deliberate mismeasure of TRUMP's realpolitik re: his campaign statements on a bellicose foreign policy. A campaign-trail theater response to more campaign-trail theater in the middle of a supposedly dead-serious discussion about being a good person who doesn't want more war. Had me cringing HARD. I just can't help but feel pain when I see a poor cuckold knowingly committing treason and humiliating themselves in public like that. It's a bad look for Senator Whatshisname here, but then again, it is not for the plants at noon to decide whether they will be illuminated by the Sun King.

In truth, the authorization to deploy the US military against the "threat of" ISIS could work very much in our favor should a TRUMP presidency actually play out. If we actually achieve the election objective, unrestricted authority to the elected to engage forces against the "threat of" ISIS might mean the difference between a glorious night of death squads showing up at traitors' houses ending our problems forever, and our lawfully impeached messiah being replaced by a zogbot.

Considering that zogbot presidents already have a connection to enough power over the meme-control apparatus to unilaterally invent reasons to go to war "lawfully", limiting the power of a future president to act in opposition to the corrupt, enslaved legislators around him indeed may be a strategic error on our part.

[Sidelle]

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/10/...cal-level.html

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daywolf]

pfff yeah? Article eight, section one of the constitution has pretty much been ignored anyway since after 1941. They did away with that already, as no one declares war any longer, that while the President has super powers to engage at will already. This is just the next step, they give him power to extend wa..r... "Extended Military Engagements". You guys are about 70yrs late with the outrage.

The guy might have a heart, but they grow those in pigs now [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Sidelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/10/...cal-level.html

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Filthy_Pagan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The nazis tried to take guns away from citizens right before the 'holocaust'.


Coincidence?

Try not... They did.