Big Thanks to Cloki from Omni

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

This thread gets some candy

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Sweettouch]

You retards are still trying to pull the GM didnt say so routine? jesus some people should be shot

[Pan]

To clarify: we're better geared and better players with more 60s (and resources) available than we had on live - across the board. And nobody's been able to manage the ring war yet here, irrespective of what they've brought to the table (we had 154 people at one point during the server's first attempt). My contention is that it says more about the state of the event itself than those who have attempted it (if you buy the warranting argument).

[khanable]

Originally Posted by Vianna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also Chest's claims that mobs wouldn't beeline for Thurg and run there is false as well. Depending on the timeline of course. This happened on live during the ring war. That is not a bug. It was changed to that way though.

Now THAT is interesting!

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Any Guild/Alliance that spawns ring war - Concedes any Dain which mistakenly spawns upon failure of said war.

Every guild agreeing to this would make it so that there is no benefit to spawning and failing wars on purpose.

Without mandating something as retarded as banning people from attempting wars just because of how overtuned (read-not impossible) the war is currently.

You forgot to log in your GM account. Otherwise this isn't the Velious beta anymore mr tryhard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Swish]

Separately I'd also like to say again how Omni is a shining example to the server, and that BDA rather than typing out a spinned "thanks" thread could start actually following their example [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Foxplay]

Only took my guild on live about 50 ppl for my ring10

But we also had Luclin AA points lol =p.....

Annnnnnd other people helped out in the zone cause it was "something to do"

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Separately I'd also like to say again how Omni is a shining example to the server, and that BDA rather than typing out a spinned "thanks" thread could start actually following their example [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Calm down, have a cheeseburger, you'll feel better.

[ManuelThePopStar]

Originally Posted by Oleris [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it's because everyone knows either FAT or rampage will win if the shit is contested. Gotta try to limit others loot if ya can't compete.

Hey, shit eater, check the Raid forums.

IT WAS <FORSAKEN> (DETOXX) WHO REQUESTED YOUR RINGWAR YOU DAIN

[PollieDarkearth]

Juev, thanks for the thread.

Originally Posted by ArumTP [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dump this thread in RnF where it belongs.

Omni has no business speaking about raid targets they have never made attempts at.

This is entirely irrelevant to Cloki's comments on the state of the server and its rules. Furthermore, considering the content of velious and the state of most raiding guilds on the server compared to the original live timeline (IE, geared to teeth, min/maxing, 100x more 60s, better class layout), any guild with the time and leadership could kill any raid mob in this era. It's the unmanageable nature of the raid scene that prevents anyone from attempting any mob.