Of the 50 people interested in Red 2.0, why don't we make our own?

[Tassador]

I can dig that single box that alone should raise interest. Got to remove a lot custom shit I think level cap and fast exp also sucks but you guys are the experts...

[Krazy/sickpuppy]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look for RoZ 3.0 in a few months. Our database isn't as good as P99's but our source is arguably better for PVP and it shouldn't even be an argument in a few more months. We are hoping to have the population to do single box only on 3.0.

Think about it.

Love your servers . But we all can agree it’s not p99 . I’m sure one day you guys will get there and I mean no shade . I will probably be on 3.0

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Ragnaros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rogean CANT stop talking about it

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by Krazy/sickpuppy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Love your servers . But we all can agree it’s not p99 . I’m sure one day you guys will get there and I mean no shade . I will probably be on 3.0

I think a lot of us feel the same way, it's hard to justify playing a "temporary" box when it doesn't come with the p99 brand name. I've never played any RoZ but will likely play 3.0 now that they've had a few years of trial and error. The box is potentially what we make it, if we round up the troops and get a nice semi-high (for pvp) pop box we could have goog time.

[watbab]

Originally Posted by Izmael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Two reasons:

- P99's database took a decade to be built be a team of volunteers and it's not public
- P99's source code took a decade to reach its current form and it's not public