Soloing from 54 to 60: tstaff or not?

[Bardp1999]

Using your fists and then equiping in the Tstaff for 1 hit then switching back to fists over and over will be a big DPS increase. Its fun Fist dpsing and then clicking in a double attack of 200 + 200 and then going back to fists. Tstaff would be cool also if it procs when you do this, althought I would think the chances are low.

[Hisamori]

Thanks, guys. I used the staff a bit in my usual spots. After some procs started landing, I am seeing the value. I'll hang onto it.

Cheers.

[Troxx]

The aggro is not problematic even with a low aggro warrior tanking. I have a flop/stand/attack macro. Dropping aggro for monks is trivial. If FD fails ... it’s not like monks are squishy. Quite the opposite, a good monk likely takes less damage than a warrior with poor aggro potential.

But yeah it’s a monster for aggro. Frostreaver is a beast at 42/43 with 125dd stun. TStaff is 120dd/stun and 29/30. 30 delay is right at a sweet spot and generates more white aggro threat than Frostreaver. Very few warrior weapon setups (practically none) can compete with TStaff. It allows monks to hold aggro when they choose to. They can always dump it if they don’t want it.

[Hisamori]

The white damage isn't bad, either. It's a lot more manageable than IFS. 30 delay down to 17.2 or so with 74% total self-buffed haste doesn't seem quite so languid.