#41
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Theophilus - Druid of the Earth Mother
Aarone - Paladin o' Brell "Tempus Fugit. Memento Mori." | ||||
|
#42
|
|||
|
These liberal Dbags can't even attempt to debunk one single sentence from my post.
Please, try and find one thing, you can't do it. I'll link you the exact line from the Talmud for any of it. | ||
|
#43
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theophilus - Druid of the Earth Mother
Aarone - Paladin o' Brell "Tempus Fugit. Memento Mori." | |||
|
#44
|
||||
|
Quote:
You highlighted some stupid part where I basically described that I'm not religious and an average white person and not a muslim since anyone anonymously posting about the evils of judaism on the internet always gets accused of being a muslim or something stupid. | |||
|
#45
|
||||
|
Quote:
From Wikipedia: The OMB defines the concept of race as outlined for the US Census as not "scientific or anthropological" and takes into account "social and cultural characteristics as well as ancestry", using "appropriate scientific methodologies" that are not "primarily biological or genetic in reference." As far as it being ridiculous to group an Irishman and a Romanian? It is entirely about your goal. If your goal was to separate based upon an umbrella color (i.e. white, black, red, orange, etc) then you are correct and have distinguished correctly. However, you could also say that their skin tones do not match exactly and that it is now an incorrect grouping. Hell, you can take two Irishmen and say they don't belong in the same grouping. You are entirely too hung up on this notion that there is a "correct" way to differentiate between people. There isn't. It is entirely about motives, goals, assumptions made, and whether it is ethically correct to do so. | |||
|
#46
|
|||
|
^^^^^
The classic definition of race is arbitrary. Largely because of the colonial evil that has been done with the backing of that definition, the word "race" has fallen out of favor. "Race" isn't the preferred scientific term, as its definition is extremely loose. For example, "native american" is often called a race, but certain tribes experienced extreme genetic isolation and are not much more genetically comparable to the Apache than they are to us. So people who say races don't exist aren't wrong, but they are only correct on a boring semantic technicality. The idea of a unique evolutionary history for grouped populations is scientifically valid. Race would sure be a convenient term for differentiating between these populations, but it's been hijacked by ignorant rednecks and RL bloob reactionaries who are more concerned about arguing with retards than actually furthering human understanding. The word just has too much history to be useful, as long as we live among such shitheads. tl;dr this whole thing is a semantic argument | ||
|
#47
|
|||
|
O god, here comes more liberal idiocy that there is no such thing as different races. Homo sapien sapiens have been around something like 50,000 years. We domesticated an animal called the dog from the wolf and the amount of time it took to create all those different breeds all with *EXTREMELY DIFFERENT* instinctual traits, personalities, aggressiveness, etc did not take very long at all. All that stuff is built into their genes so of course there are enormous differences in different human races.
There was Mitochondrial Eve in Africa (LO haplogroup) which spawned the L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6 groups. L3 divided into Haplogroup M and N which left africa while the L's stayed. N group is european whites. M turned into asians, indians, mexicans, etc And that's all there is too it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] If you want to find the most primitive people on earth, you go back to the source of where it all began where the L groups still exist to this day. Science is a bitch and it's not supposed to be politically correct. It's offensive. Too bad liberals just stick their heads in the sand and pretend like it doesn't exist: [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Some nations live in skyscrapers, some live in mud huts. The reason for this isn't because all humans are equal. Natural selection doesn't create equality. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Now lets end this with the destruction of another liberal myth. "Genes, Not Culture: Why the Japanese don't loot": http://www.vdare.com/taylor/110318_japanese.htm "“Diversity” is a source of conflict and tension, not strength, and the Japanese know it. Thanks to very restrictive immigration, Japan is one of the most homogeneous nations on earth. Its people know that the country belongs to all of them, and they treat it and each other that way" Do I also need to remind you that we're 99% equal in genetics to this creature? You can be extremely closely related and still have inherent genetic traits that are extremely different. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I can't wait for all the whining from San Francisco hairdressers that occurs due to this thread. I'm sure 0 of their complaints will be backed with facts either. And by the way, nothing in this post advocates hatred or murder or death or anything like that. All I did was list what the facts of human evolution are before some fool spams "racism". | ||
Last edited by wehrmacht; 04-02-2011 at 03:34 PM..
|
|
#48
|
||||
|
Quote:
Actually there is no discernable racism in the commercial, although the nationalism is blatant. If you don't know the difference between racism and nationalism, then you might be a redneck from Chappaquiddick. | |||
|
#49
|
|||
|
lol wehrmacht.
| ||
|
#50
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Give me a one (two at most?) sentence clear cut definition of what a race is, and I might believe that you two aren't completely idiotic..
__________________
| ||||
|
|
|