Potential changes to the way CHA works for enchanters

[Tann]

Originally Posted by ghostwalker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think this should be overlooked... if the guy who created and designed the class is saying that CHA is essential to how charm functions, then perhaps this should be heeded. Things did change with Luclin and POP, and as others have pointed out, who is to say that TAKP is "more" classic when it is based on that era, and not classic? Why would you make CHA irrelevant, completely contradicting the designer's own words?

Oh it's absolutely getting overlooked cause the enchanter hate is strong here, a possible non-classic change that the haters and "make it classic" people are now campaigning for with no evidence.

[Seducio]

Whoever thinks the devs still care to 'make it classic' has lost the plot.

This is Rogean and Nilbog's baby in every way.

They can do whatever they like.

[yennenhoj]

I'd never be able to find it, but I remember back in the day the developers stating several times that enchanters were giving charisma too much credit. That it played a role in charms (and mez?), but that level and MR were much bigger factors. Something like, if your level and MR checks fail your CHA check has a small chance of helping you out.

My, very hazy, memory of charming pre-Luclin is that charm normally didn't last long enough for me to kill 2 mobs and often didn't last long enough to kill 1. That may have been user error, though.

[Tunabros]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Whoever thinks the devs still care to 'make it classic' has lost the plot.

This is Rogean and Nilbog's baby in every way.

They can do whatever they like.

and we are their guinea pigs