Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Casters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 06-30-2022, 10:40 AM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eleandra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
WAIT! There was a change
There were lots of changes ... with everything, not just charm, made without any public announcement.

Thus, I don't think it's safe to assume that because Verant never announced "we're changing charm" that charm hadn't changed since '99 (and the same could be said of Feign Death, or Sneak, or whatever else in EQ).
__________________

Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides
Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 06-30-2022, 11:29 AM
bilirubin bilirubin is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 152
Default

People arguing with Loramin should realize he's only making a fuss because he's had his a4 camp stolen one too many times by pesky gnome enchanters. As an aside, let's not ignore the fact that shamans greatly outnumber enchanters at those camps in PoM (as well as many other "cash camps" since charming can be so incredibly tedious).

Back on topic, there is no in-era evidence that the charisma stat was not used in the calculation for charm duration. In fact, we have evidence of the contrary from comments made by the developers themselves. The EQemu guy argued that Zatkin, the spell designer, was somehow mistaken about the charm spell, but there's a recent interview with Zatkin on youtube that I think shows how conscientious and meticulous he was working on EQ. He even speaks to how from the very beginning, McQuaid and Zatkin had envisioned enchanter's charm spell to be especially powerful in the game. I think that's quite telling.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 06-30-2022, 06:10 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eleandra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
WAIT! There was a change: one AA was 'total domination', which lowered the mob's chance to break charm.
THIS is the kind of stuff I am looking for. Good stuff
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 06-30-2022, 06:10 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There were lots of changes ... with everything, not just charm, made without any public announcement.
Doesn't hold water in elf court.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 06-30-2022, 11:21 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,494
Default

Total domination AA does lead to some credible info that charm became more powerful later on which led to the nerf. But is charm as it currently stands OP, and should CHA not impact it?

Did a little research on the total domination AA.

https://forums.daybreakgames.com/eq/....230860/page-3

A few interesting bits in here. It is out of era of course. But the major thing I picked out of the posts is that seems like it's pretty common knowledge that CHA has always been included in the charming formula for enchanters.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 06-30-2022, 11:38 PM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bilirubin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
People arguing with Loramin should realize he's only making a fuss because he's had his a4 camp stolen one too many times by pesky gnome enchanters. As an aside, let's not ignore the fact that shamans greatly outnumber enchanters at those camps in PoM (as well as many other "cash camps" since charming can be so incredibly tedious).
I haven't played on Loramin/Blue, let alone in A4 specifically, for months ... but ok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, when Green 2.0 comes out I'm rolling an Enchanter main: so any "nerf" would hurt me. I want to play the classic Enchanter, not the easy-mode one. That class was still a great class that was totally worth playing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bilirubin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He even speaks to how from the very beginning, McQuaid and Zatkin had envisioned enchanter's charm spell to be especially powerful in the game. I think that's quite telling.
No one is saying charm shouldn't be powerful: of course it should be, because the point of this place is to emulate EQ in '99- '01, and charm was powerful back then.

All I'm saying is that there was a trade-off for that power back in '99, and that trade-off is that it was risky. It should be risky here too.
__________________

Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides
Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 07-02-2022, 01:10 AM
Vormotus Vormotus is offline
Fire Giant

Vormotus's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 734
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I haven't played on Loramin/Blue, let alone in A4 specifically, for months ... but ok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, when Green 2.0 comes out I'm rolling an Enchanter main: so any "nerf" would hurt me. I want to play the classic Enchanter, not the easy-mode one. That class was still a great class that was totally worth playing.
When is that?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
----------------------------------
Ikoparu - Necromancer of Bertoxxulous (Green)
Euridun - Druid of Karana (Blue)
----------------------------------
[center]
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 07-02-2022, 03:19 AM
Zuranthium Zuranthium is offline
Planar Protector

Zuranthium's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 1,385
Default

1.) Charm during the first year+ of EQ was just used to Charm an NPC and throw it into another so they fight each other. It was Velious era when Enchanters were starting to Charm more long term, but that wasn't totally common, still something that braver Enchanters were doing rather than being the norm.

2.) Regardless of what the exact Charm mechanics were back then, it absolutely would have been nerfed if people back then were using it has they have been on p99.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 07-02-2022, 12:02 PM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vormotus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When is that?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No official announcement yet, but the whole point of this place is to keep producing Green servers, so ...

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
1.) Charm during the first year+ of EQ was just used to Charm an NPC and throw it into another so they fight each other. It was Velious era when Enchanters were starting to Charm more long term, but that wasn't totally common, still something that braver Enchanters were doing rather than being the norm.

2.) Regardless of what the exact Charm mechanics were back then, it absolutely would have been nerfed if people back then were using it has they have been on p99.
Agreed ... although I do think all classes were experimenting with all their spells from day one, because no one knew any better. I remember wasting lots of time experimenting with the Shaman Rain line of spells, for instance [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So I don't think it's that no one tried charming: they totally did! And some surely tried (say) charming in groups. The reason you didn't see Enchanters charming in group in classic wasn't that no one thought to try ... it's that they did try, and it was too risky, so they stopped doing it.
__________________

Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides
Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 07-06-2022, 03:13 PM
bilirubin bilirubin is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2.) Regardless of what the exact Charm mechanics were back then, it absolutely would have been nerfed if people back then were using it has they have been on p99.
Irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.