Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #641  
Old 11-24-2019, 10:30 PM
bubur bubur is offline
Planar Protector

bubur's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kul69 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It doesn't even matter if there is no evidence.
ya i think i'm done here. good luck with your all caps screaming and crying buddy
  #642  
Old 11-24-2019, 10:33 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ya i think i'm done here. good luck with your all caps screaming and crying buddy
Lmao, right? “It doesn’t matter I want what I want”
  #643  
Old 11-24-2019, 11:13 PM
sentinel sentinel is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 150
Default

two sides are fighting.

1. Charm mechanics are not classic! We know this bc of anecdotal evidence! (and we don't like it)

2. Charm mechanics are classic! We know this bc of anecdotal evidence! (and we like it)
  #644  
Old 11-24-2019, 11:18 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
two sides are fighting.

1. Charm mechanics are not classic! We know this bc of anecdotal evidence! (and we don't like it)

2. Charm mechanics are classic! We know this bc of anecdotal evidence! (and we like it)
TBH, I wouldn’t care if they change the charm mechanics at all, but only if they do so based on actual real evidence
  #645  
Old 11-25-2019, 12:12 AM
TripSin TripSin is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 462
Default

I literally played an enchanter, starting about the time that Kunark came out and literally charm solo'd as an enchanter when I couldn't find a group. I was like 14 years old at the time, but you can't tell me it didn't happen. I wasn't even the only one, I distinctly remember having to regularly compete with other enchanters who were also charm soloing hill giants in rathe mountains.

I haven't tried out charm on P99, but people like OP who are saying that charming wasn't viable in classic are wrong.
Last edited by TripSin; 11-25-2019 at 12:36 AM..
  #646  
Old 11-25-2019, 12:24 AM
jacob54311 jacob54311 is offline
Kobold

jacob54311's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 135
Default

Literally? You don't mean figuratively? Like you're saying you solo'd an enchanter as some kind of metaphor or something?

Kidding. Sorry.
  #647  
Old 11-25-2019, 12:35 AM
TripSin TripSin is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacob54311 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Literally? You don't mean figuratively? Like you're saying you solo'd an enchanter as some kind of metaphor or something?

Kidding. Sorry.
Literally! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #648  
Old 11-25-2019, 12:49 AM
Zuranthium Zuranthium is offline
Planar Protector

Zuranthium's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 1,385
Default

It's going to be pretty much impossible to get concrete data about charm from back in the day. I do think it's likely, however, that it used to break at least somewhat more commonly. I remember Enchanters in their high 40's getting a lot of breaks when trying to charm level 40 mobs (the original gate guards at cities).

Charm back in the day was definitely not used to the extent, and with the widespread ease, that it is now. Enchanters usually didn't permanently charm a pet back then. They would charm something to throw into another mob, let them beat on each other, and then the group (or themself solo with a DD spell) would finish off both mobs when they got low. It wasn't until Velious era that Enchanters were more commonly using Charm for reliably longer lasting pet, which could mean 2 other factors as well - a lot more Enchanters being high 50's/60 at that point, increasing the level gap of what a low blue con mob would be, and also how high their CHA was.

Either way, Charm as it's used now would have been nerfed back then, had the game evolved quickly enough for the devs to target the problem. The argument about Necromancers on Green being nerfed from what they actually were in classic is an extremely good argument for why Enchanters should also be nerfed.
__________________
  #649  
Old 11-25-2019, 06:37 AM
A1551 A1551 is offline
Sarnak

A1551's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kul69 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


EVIDENCE DOESN'T MATTER, ENCHANTER NEEDS TO BE NERFED SAME AS NECRO AND OTHER CLASSES THAT AREN'T GETTING CLASSIC BEHAVIOR DUE TO GAME IMPACT.


Get it through your thick fucking skull. You've been here crying no evidence now probably 30 times. It doesn't even matter if there is no evidence. Enchanter should still be nerfed. Why does Necro not get to be the uber class that every group stands back and heals their pet? That is how it was in actual classic EQ. Necro was nerfed. Enchanter needs to be nerfed.
Oh ok, if you say so. Since you used BIG LETTERS AND ALL CAPS im sure the staff will get right on implementing your very persuasive argument!
__________________
Blue
-Propo Fol, Enchanter
-Adeno Sine, Monk
<Azure Guard>

Green
-Curare, Necromancer
  #650  
Old 11-25-2019, 09:35 AM
Wurl Wurl is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 114
Default

Hopefully staff can cut through the noise from pixel-poisoned enchanters in this thread, and they remove the un-classic on-tick charm break bonus from CHA.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.