#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
Despite that, mechanics get changed based on "feels" based posts, and extensive whining. As long as people complain long enough in a positive tone and throw in some smileys, they'll succeed at getting things nerfed despite lack of evidence. Hope this helps clear your confusion. | |||
|
#22
|
|||
|
What was the 'pre nerf' implementation based on?
| ||
|
#23
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do you think it is realistic to have to defend every aspect of p1999 against factless posts that suggest things change? | |||
|
#24
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
Last edited by Jimjam; 11-17-2021 at 05:40 PM..
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
We can disagree on that. I don't see what point you are trying to make if not that. | |||
|
#26
|
||||
|
Quote:
I guess we'll see how the emergent game play is after the change has settled and see whether or not it feels more classic. | |||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course you know that. | |||
|
#28
|
|||
|
It would be a little sad if the meta remains exactly the same, just with worse luck on breaks. If that is the case, and it feels less classic, then I suppose a revert would be in order.
| ||
|
#29
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#30
|
||||
|
Quote:
As reverts generally don’t happen I suppose the dev team only implements changes they feel are a step closer to classic and the arguments, even if they lacked what you might consider hard evidence, were persuasive enough to make the decision to change. | |||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|