Merriam-Webster Word of the Year 2017

[JurisDictum]

They didn't put theft up there. And I want to know who's getting killed.

[mickmoranis]

"Men need to shut up and listen." @whereisdaz​ slams the #MattDamon-style responses to the #MeToo movement #TheDrum

https://twitter.com/ABCthedrum/statu...70539172118529

"not all men" BOOOOOOOO!
"not all immigrants" YAYYYYYYY!

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They didn't put theft up there. And I want to know who's getting killed.

of course a liberal is going to be OK with non whites being killed. If someone is being killed, someone is being killed. Why do you need to find out "who" is being killed? OH I already know. Because you only care about murder if it's a white person in a public venue like a movie theater or concernt (both places YOU go) but if they are killing minorities? Well that's because of slavery 200 years ago and we should be paying those people money cus it is specifically OUR fault.

[mickmoranis]

Oceans 11 "we came up with a heist movie and cast popular actors who seemed to fit the ideas we had, and that's sexist"

Oceans 8 "we cast a heist movie specifically with only women, and that's not sexist at all"

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Men need to shut up and listen." @whereisdaz​ slams the #MattDamon-style responses to the #MeToo movement #TheDrum

https://twitter.com/ABCthedrum/statu...70539172118529

"not all men" BOOOOOOOO!
"not all immigrants" YAYYYYYYY!



of course a liberal is going to be OK with non whites being killed. If someone is being killed, someone is being killed. Why do you need to find out "who" is being killed? OH I already know. Because you only care about murder if it's a white person in a public venue like a movie theater or concernt (both places YOU go) but if they are killing minorities? Well that's because of slavery 200 years ago and we should be paying those people money cus it is specifically OUR fault.

Well the whole bullshit point is that taking in immigrants will increase bad things happening to people that were here before the immigrants right? So if they have some sub community where murder and violence is more common among themselves -- it doesn't prove that native born Americans are anymore likely to get murdered, does it?

[mickmoranis]

No that is not the point at all. The point is that contrary to liberal talking points, yes illegal immigrants commit more crime than legal immigrants.

If you want to say taking on more illegals will increase crime, you're safe to say that. If you want to say that that wont, there is data that contradicts that opinion.

But that doesn't change your opinion cus, well, you're a libtard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[loramin]

When the police don't come (or take hours to come) when there's a problem in your neighborhood you start settling it yourself, by force if necessary ... the exact same way native white people in medieval Europe used to settle things (they didn't have police either).

I imagine this makes immigrant/poor neighborhoods (there's a big overlap between the two) in any country more violent by nature, but it's hard to blame the immigrants for having crappier police protection than more affluent neighborhoods.

Also, immigrants tend to have seen some shit; you don't uproot your entire life and leave the only country you've ever known because things are going great, you leave because everyone around you is starving to death, the government is torturing/raping/murdering everyone, etc. That kind of psychic damage would make any person, anywhere, more violent. But if you have the empathy to say "hey people with shitty lives, why not come live with us where it's less shitty" you should have empathy to understand that people coming from those shitty lives will have a bit more mental shit to deal with.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When the police don't come (or take hours to come) when there's a problem in your neighborhood you start settling it yourself, by force if necessary ... the exact same way native white people in medieval Europe used to settle things (they didn't have police either).

If police do come then someone videotapes them out of context and makes up lies about how the victim was pleading for his life and the cops are raycist. Despite the fact that you seem unaware there is more police presence in minority neighborhoods than affluent ones.

But then again, are you saying that gun control is wrong because the people who live in the boonies have not only a right to own guns but they are a necessity because it takes 20-45 minuets for the police to arrive?

Or are you saying gang violence exists because people in gangland are protecting themselves from petty thieves and not killing each other over turf wars and living in a culture of violence?

[JurisDictum]

Maybe there would be a little less murder if we weren't arresting them at obscene rates for drug crimes and sending them to hardcore pound-me-in-the-ass prisons. Something about lots of prison time seems to make people more aggressive and less successful at parenting their 2-3 kids.

[fash]

Hey, guys. Let's get back on topic, please.

Why have feminists been quiet about the 1,400 girls abused in Rotherham in the UK who were as young as 11?

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rother...tation_scandal

In August 2014 the Jay report concluded that an estimated 1,400 children, most of them white girls aged 11–15, had been sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 by predominantly British-Pakistani men.

[snip]

The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing them with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape their mothers and younger sisters, and trafficking them to other towns. There were pregnancies—one at age 12—terminations, miscarriages, babies raised by their mothers, and babies removed, causing further trauma.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why don't feminists speak about Rotherham? It is because that one female accomplice has a feminism-signaling hair-cut, right? That's the only possible reason I can discern from the mugshots.

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey, guys. Let's get back on topic, please.

Why have feminists been quiet about the 1,400 girls abused in Rotherham in the UK who were as young as 11?

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rother...tation_scandal



[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why don't feminists speak about Rotherham? It is because that one female accomplice has a feminism-signaling hair-cut, right? That's the only possible reason I can discern from the mugshots.

Sounds like their all fucked -- what do we add? "there behavior was unacceptable"? Shame on them...whatever