******Official politics thread ******

[ScaringChildren]

Why would you even post that?

It tells us nothing.

We know Trump is like that.

[Irulan]

I wonder if he took mlk day off

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would you even post that?

It tells us nothing.

We know Trump is like that.

because it rules

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

because it rules

Why would you think rules?

It shows Trump as a stubborn leader who doesn't have time for flimsy RINO bureaucracy.

It shows he's a man with his own ideas and goals.

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You tell me not to be a fan of someone and then you go and claim that Hawking is so smart that he isn't capable of being anything but objective...

You should look at yourself before you lecture anyone, bud.

Just because you're smart doesn't mean you're invulnerable to having biased subjective opinions.

That's one of the most strange things I've ever heard anyone say.

Nope. I am not a fan of Hawkings, nor a great admirer; and I'd like for him to be wrong about a few other of his predictions. But he did write some noteworthy passages which few others could have in our time.

"Invulnerable to having bias." I like that word, but I didn't use it because it would have rightfully gotten picked apart. To be clear, it's not a matter of how smart one is, but their ability to consider, ponder, and "look at oneself" as you suggested I do. Mental gymnastics, the likes of which only Jung, Nietzsche, Campbell, and Watts were capable of to the extent where society and the behaviors it encouraged could be looked at by those within it, as if they were foreign to themselves, and deconstructed without one crumbling beneath the other. Imo.

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope. I am not a fan of Hawkings, nor a great admirer; and I'd like for him to be wrong about a few other of his predictions. But he did write some noteworthy passages which few others could have in our time.

"Invulnerable to having bias." I like that word, but I didn't use it because it would have rightfully gotten picked apart. To be clear, it's not a matter of how smart one is, but their ability to consider, ponder, and "look at oneself" as you suggested I do. Mental gymnastics, the likes of which only Jung, Nietzsche, and Watts were capable of.

Jung and nietzsche made one hell of a lot more sense than those pedophiles Marcusse, Derrida, and Foucault the left likes to hold up like paragons of virtue.

U do realize postmodernists like the 3 i just named were pedo0hile advocates, right?

Read eros and civilization and sexual morality and the law

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope. I am not a fan of Hawkings, nor a great admirer; and I'd like for him to be wrong about a few other of his predictions. But he did write some noteworthy passages which few others could have in our time.

"Invulnerable to having bias." I like that word, but I didn't use it because it would have rightfully gotten picked apart. To be clear, it's not a matter of how smart one is, but their ability to consider, ponder, and "look at oneself" as you suggested I do. Mental gymnastics, the likes of which only Jung, Nietzsche, and Watts were capable of.

Yep, I casually used 'invulnerable' instead of its proper definition.

I'm not surprised that you're pedantic. I've watched a ton of your videos.

You're the one saying that smart people are forced to think objectively, which is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

Intelligence isn't the be all end all like you apparently think and bias can cloud anyone's judgment.

Every man has flaws and no one is an expert at everything.

He's was a Physicist. Not a political expert.

He even said in the video that he can't explain it.

So why would you value his opinion.

The man told you he can't explain it.

It just makes you look stupid.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would you think rules?

It shows Trump as a stubborn leader who doesn't have time for flimsy RINO bureaucracy.

It shows he's a man with his own ideas and goals.

If Trump ate his own shit you'd call it a genius new diet

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Wonkie

At times, Trump evinced less rage than a lack of interest. Sims recounts...

Ryan kept talking as the president wandered down the hall...

https://youtu.be/JQDTSu8v8QI

[ScaringChildren]

https://theintercept.com/2019/01/20/...prussia-story/