I N D I C T E D

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[REDACTED]

And also, a state having local laws on colluding with a foreign power

LOL

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And also, a state having local laws on colluding with a foreign power

LOL

The California Constitution states that "treason against the State consists only in levying war against it, adhering to its enemies, or giving them aid and comfort.

i hope that answers your question

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i hope that answers your question

Cool California law.

We're talking about NY here.

Lemme know when you find a law more strict than the federal lol

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cool California law.

We're talking about NY here.

Lemme know when you find a law more strict than the federal lol

have you tried googling it?

[Jaxon]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The investigation "established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts." - Robert S. Mueller

The investigation didn't conclude that a conspiracy took place but show me where it says "no conspiracy took place."

It's not to job of law enforcement to prove that things didn't happen, because that's impossible. All they can do is look at the evidence there is and determine whether or not it's sufficient to prove conspiracy, and it Trump's case it did not. So in the eyes of the law, no conspiracy took place.

Also regarding that quote from the report, there's nothing criminal about Trump figuring out that Democrat emails getting leaked would help him win. Having a standard that low kind of makes everyone a criminal.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

have you tried googling it?

Yep, there's nothing there.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not to job of law enforcement to prove that things didn't happen, because that's impossible. All they can do is look at the evidence there is and determine whether or not it's sufficient to prove conspiracy, and it Trump's case it did not. So in the eyes of the law, no conspiracy took place.

Also regarding that quote from the report, there's nothing criminal about Trump figuring out that Democrat emails getting leaked would help him win. Having a standard that low kind of makes everyone a criminal.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Link?

Also Page 2 of the Mueller Report he addresses this.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

piss tape is real

"Rtskhiladze later admitted he had been told the tapes were fake, but he did not communicate that to Cohen, the report says."

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Rtskhiladze later admitted he had been told the tapes were fake, but he did not communicate that to Cohen, the report says."

so we're just taking his word for it? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]