|
View Poll Results: Do you live in one of America's inner cities? | |||
Yes, I live in a but I got inner city | 41 | 18.55% | |
Yes, I live in a crime infested inner city | 35 | 15.84% | |
Yes, I live in a burning crime infested inner city | 33 | 14.93% | |
Bush burned the crime infested towers | 153 | 69.23% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Quote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8wQ0BXExYkg Can only do brief bursts because the main gun's recoil can stall the aircraft.
__________________
| |||
|
|
Quote:
Clinton said it because it was giving rise to right wingers. Kerry said it because it was having an impact on climate change. | |||
|
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
Evidence we don't need to worry about global warming and that the free market will solve it.
https://news.rutgers.edu/how-convert...0#.W_rZo2ROl-H | ||
|
|
Quote:
That is hilarious. If that's what she's saying, then her argument is to segregate Europe so that white nationalist won't become popular? She's saying that in order to combat white nationalism we should have white nationalism? LMAO that's fantastic. | |||
|
|
Quote:
She condemns it because it causes a loss of power, not because it's legitimately horrible for regular Europeans. | |||
|
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
You know were close to losing the Asian vote with this Harvard BS. Its a very important issue for Asians -- which should be fucking obvious if you've set foot in college in the last 10 years.
You know its not like they don't see what these white elites are doing. They get in on legacy and then jack up the standards for middle/poor people. That's fine. It turns out middle/poor academic achievers have a very high chance of being Asian. Its all bullshit. The entire education industry -- owned mostly by bill gates -- is based on lies. And the central lie is: we can tell who the talented adults will be. We can pinpoint the kids, solo them out, and make them even better! In reality, you can't tell who could be the best lawyer, writter, doctor or whatever, based on how far they are ahead when they are 10 years old. Or 18 years old. Or even 23. The idea that we are only honestly trying to find the "leaders of tomarrow" and help them out is a pretty laughable notion. The military might do something like that (in a limited context like a special program), but not Harvard. Harvard is set up to sell social positions to rich people. And Asians are ruining their business. Too many of them that are too smart and its ruining their whole myth that these white elite kids are the best and brightest. Maybe the world has outgrown Plato's academy? That's really the concept these elite schools are based on. It's a very popular idea with straight A passive nerds that "philosopher kings" should rule society based on their school performance. | ||
Last edited by JurisDictum; 11-25-2018 at 03:18 PM..
|
|
|
|