Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Do you live in one of America's inner cities?
Yes, I live in a but I got inner city 41 18.55%
Yes, I live in a crime infested inner city 35 15.84%
Yes, I live in a burning crime infested inner city 33 14.93%
Bush burned the crime infested towers 153 69.23%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #7661  
Old 12-03-2017, 12:47 AM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reading The Federalist to me -- is like putting a tin bucket over my head and banging the outside with a hammer. Add a banjo in the background that kicks up from time to time and that's what I call The Federalist Experience.

But they did publish this interesting article: I’m A Liberal, And I Agree With Sean Hannity That American Journalism Is Dead

I guess The Federalist doesn't realize that this doesn't mean the Democratic party is doomed. They just don't see the connection to the Sander's populism to come. DNC insiders bet in good with the Sanders butt kissers now if they want to be spared later.
bernie isnt a democrat

and he woulda won
  #7662  
Old 12-03-2017, 12:55 AM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

that win/loss for bernie is like a multiverse splitter type moment.
  #7663  
Old 12-03-2017, 04:25 AM
AzzarTheGod AzzarTheGod is offline
Planar Protector

AzzarTheGod's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sullon Zek
Posts: 7,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
bernie isnt a democrat

and he woulda won
probably. bernie had more appeal than Trump to the heartland and swing states, of which Hillary had absolutely none.

Question is, would Trump go after Bernie the same way Hillary went after Bernie? Using "socialism" and calling him "socialist" as a repetitive slur.

If Hillary were to have been eliminated in the primary, does Trump use her playbook and beat Bernie head to head? Is "he's a socialist" meme adaptable to the Trump campaign or was that just a Hillary elitist California-NYC demo thing. I'm not sure how the heartland would respond to the slur, since we don't educate low info voters on different types of governments, nor is Bernie actually a socialist which adds an extreme layer of difficulty in explaining.

2016 regardless of your politic was a once in a lifetime whopper. We'll retell it decades from now. "remember that time Hillary celebrated her win on a private jet while facing a landslide electoral college loss of epic proportions"...."tell us about it dad!"
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx

PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek
Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82
Last edited by AzzarTheGod; 12-03-2017 at 04:28 AM..
  #7664  
Old 12-03-2017, 04:29 AM
AzzarTheGod AzzarTheGod is offline
Planar Protector

AzzarTheGod's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sullon Zek
Posts: 7,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
that win/loss for bernie is like a multiverse splitter type moment.
Exactly.

0bama talks about Forward yet Hillary was a vote for special interests. Puts a stain on Barrack's legacy I'd say.
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx

PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek
Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82
  #7665  
Old 12-03-2017, 09:36 AM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Exactly.

0bama talks about Forward yet Hillary was a vote for special interests. Puts a stain on Barrack's legacy I'd say.
The folks at the trough aren't done feeding, and Bernie's guests were definately not welcome. Efficient government is for suckers.
__________________
  #7666  
Old 12-03-2017, 11:35 AM
Lhancelot Lhancelot is offline
Planar Protector

Lhancelot's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
probably. bernie had more appeal than Trump to the heartland and swing states, of which Hillary had absolutely none.
MORE appeal? I suppose. Let's be honest both were hideous choices, right? This election was the first time where I honestly felt I had zero choice.

I despised Hillary's fake stupid southern accent when she ran around southern states coupled with her disingenuous faky shit eating grin, she just oozed slimeball. I know enough of her past political history as well as her husbands to understand I wanted nothing to do with her in the White House.

I looked at Trump nearly the same just with slightly different slimeball attributes that made him 100% disgusting to me as a human being. He's nearly the same as Hillary only he is less eloquent in speaking and seems a bit more stupid, but he is adept at trolling on Twitter I guess that is a plus?

Fact is they both are narcissistic lying sociopaths.

When I seen that these two presidential nominees were being propped up before us as a nation, I understood then the puppetmasters truly were in full control of who was to be our president because never have I ever see such a pile of shit to choose from regarding who was to be the next POTUS.

I just hope next selection for POTUS is a bit more believable. Puppetmasters, you can do better!
  #7667  
Old 12-03-2017, 01:03 PM
JurisDictum JurisDictum is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,977
Default

You guys don't even realize what this tax bill means. It's Republicans signaling that they gave up any chance of getting a popular majority in the near future. The tax code is historically unpopular and I have not even seen good "fake news" reasons why it should be good for anyone. Some garbled B.S. about how trickle-down economics will surely work this time!

Tim Kane* published an article: Redefining 'Winners and Losers' on Taxes to convince us. It says that we were looking at it all wrong. Who cares if its better for rich people than poor people -- that point is ...it's good for America

Awww folks...Doesn't that warm your heart?

But the more realistic take is Republicans Are Looting the Treasury While They Still Can. Because they know even if Trump can pull off a re-election somehow -- a lot of them and their lobbyists are pretty much fucked.

*
Quote:
Timothy Joseph "Tim" Kane (born April 28, 1968) is an American economist, currently serving as a research Fellow at the Hoover Institution and editor of Peregrine, a journal on immigration to the United States. He was formerly the chief economist at the Hudson Institute, a Senior Fellow of the Kauffman Institute, and was Director of the Center for International Trade and Economics at the Heritage Foundation. He was the lead editor of the 2007 Index of Economic Freedom, co-published by The Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation, and is the author of the book Bleeding Talent: How the U.S. Military Mismanages Great Leaders and Why It's Time for a Revolution. Kane co-authored the book, Balance: How Great Powers Lost It and How America Can Regain It with Glenn Hubbard
Way to show them how to revolution Kane!
Last edited by JurisDictum; 12-03-2017 at 01:12 PM..
  #7668  
Old 12-03-2017, 01:08 PM
Patriam1066 Patriam1066 is offline
Planar Protector

Patriam1066's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,876
Default

Those lobbyists have both sides bud. Inertia is a hard thing to overcome.

Also, while this tax bill is bad, id love to know why we give tax credits for having children. Pro tip: kids are expensive. Don't have them if you're anywhere near needing that tax credit
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran
  #7669  
Old 12-03-2017, 01:09 PM
Lhancelot Lhancelot is offline
Planar Protector

Lhancelot's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Those lobbyists have both sides bud. Inertia is a hard thing to overcome.

Also, while this tax bill is bad, id love to know why we give tax credits for having children. Pro tip: kids are expensive. Don't have them if you're anywhere near needing that tax credit
They need people to have babies who would we send to war without a thriving population...
  #7670  
Old 12-03-2017, 01:10 PM
Patriam1066 Patriam1066 is offline
Planar Protector

Patriam1066's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lhancelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They need people to have babies who would we send to war without a thriving population...
Mexicans. They'll shit out 5 kids regardless
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.