******Official politics thread ******

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would you think there's no evidence when the SCO has been so tight-lipped on anything they find? Do you think that SEVERAL convictions of everyone around him+ guilty pleas are just coincidence? Are you that daft? You don't go straight for the head of the operation, you work your way up the ladder until there's no way he can escape.

I wish you understood ANYTHING about how prosecution and evidence/fact finding works. You can keep saying there's no evidence but the fact of the matter is, once it comes out, I am going to use a pair of scissors to chop off your dick as per our agreement.

They're going after Twitter activists now for lying to the investigators over actions that aren't even illegal.

Sorry to tell you there's nothing there.

They would've already arrested Trump if there was something.

[ScaringChildren]

Believe Women amirite, guys

[feniin]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You apparently don't remember the "gross negligence" comments.

K

Doesn't sound like a prosecutable crime?

[feniin]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They're going after Twitter activists now for lying to the investigators over actions that aren't even illegal.

Sorry to tell you there's nothing there.

They would've already arrested Trump if there was something.

Lying to a federal investigator is the crime, you stupid fuck.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Doesn't sound like a prosecutable crime?

They chose not to prosecute her, but she did break the law.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lying to a federal investigator is the crime, you stupid fuck.

I know that. Jesus, your reading comprehension is shit.

But what he lied about wasn't illegal.

He's more than welcome to speak to Wikileaks. He wasn't even part of the administration.

Do you think it should be illegal to speak to someone?

We're breaking the law now of you do.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They chose not to prosecute her, but she did break the law.

nope

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nope

Yep

[Irulan]

SC is right. Hillary should have had her clearances revoked and should never hold a leadership position with the livelyhood of others under her again.

The answer wasn't to find other unqualified or untrustworthy people to lead either.

Americans need to raise our standards and hire younger more abled people. Not oligarchal puppets.

Now Mick. You are right. We should remain skeptical of our multimedia, especially when they are being opinionated and trying to make the narrative look good through sketchy pictures and symbolic meaning. And emotion. Other than facts.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SC is right. Hillary should have had her clearances revoked and should never hold a leadership position with the livelyhood of others under her again.

The answer wasn't to find other unqualified or untrustworthy people to lead either.

Americans need to raise our standards and hire younger more abled people. Not oligarchal puppets.

Now Mick. You are right. We should remain skeptical of our multimedia, especially when they are being opinionated and trying to make the narrative look good through sketchy pictures and symbolic meaning. And emotion. Other than facts.

nah. executives cant violate classification when they are the authority that decides it.

hope this helps