|
View Poll Results: How do you feel about Enchanter's power level? Multiple choice allowed. | |||
Non-classically overpowered and needs nerf | 66 | 33.33% | |
Non-classically overpowered and does not need nerf | 19 | 9.60% | |
Classically overpowered and needs nerf (Bard, Nec, etc examples) | 23 | 11.62% | |
Classically overpowered and does not need nerf | 88 | 44.44% | |
Trivializes content and needs nerf | 42 | 21.21% | |
Trivializes content and does not need nerf | 16 | 8.08% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
Nerf enc, necs, shamans who solo too well.
Also monks who aren't meant to take hits so well. Definitely nerfs bards too. AE kiting LOL. Then maybe we can finally enjoy some EQ? | ||
|
#72
|
|||
|
if ur class cant solo shit then whats the fuckin point of playing it lol
| ||
|
#73
|
|||
|
enchanters suck alone, let em be.
| ||
|
#74
|
||||
|
Quote:
There were plenty of old school players who were extremely talented, knowledgeable and who had good hardware and connections. And yet Enchanters were not the godlike charming class in the classic era the way they are on P1999. They were a class that specialized in CC and buffing. Further, as azxten pointed out, anyone who played in the classic era remembers just how contentious an issue class balance was for both the developers and the playerbase. The idea that Enchanters would have been knowingly allowed to run roughshod through the game with charm when the original developers were still in charge is completely asinine. If such things had been happening Enchanters would have been nerfed into the ground with a vengeance. But they weren't because charm mechanics in the classic era were already much more unforgiving than on P1999, and so no nerf was needed. | |||
|
#75
|
|||
|
http://www.afterlifeguild.org/Thott/bard_charm.php
a discussion about charm from possibly one of the most knowledgeable players overall in classic - velious EQ. If you read through all eras of charm are discussed briefly, and gives the indication that charm was used by Enchanters as well in the classic, kunark, and velious era. | ||
|
#76
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#77
|
|||
|
Op is right about every single thing he said
| ||
|
#78
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#79
|
|||
|
This thread is pretty sad.
| ||
|
#80
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am still waiting for that evidence Enchanters were charming in planes during classic era and using charmed pets in dragon fights. All the evidence I see supports the idea that charm soloing was possible but it was only efficient in outdoor zones with good gearing. There was also charm soloing in dungeons on big mobs like FGs in solb but many posts openly admit the huge risk of death in these situations that is minimal on P99. Everyone gets caught up in the idea that Charm obviously was possible like it is on P99. They're ignoring my argument that the risk is just not as present as live primarily due to channeling. I don't know why that enrages everyone. Channeling is not classic. End of story. Are you saying the channeling evidence isn't good enough? It doesn't impact Enchanter? I don't know. All you seem to do is come in here and insult me like a pathetic loser. P.S. Most of the claims in this thread and links to bug reports aren't even from me. I'm just aggregating everything to show how much Enchanter is being ignored in terms of bugs. So my "lies" are just primarily the work of others like Dolalin. I'm just pushing the issue instead of letting all these evidence backed bug reports fade away. Also for the record I completely understand the devs difficult position related to these bugs but it has reached a point that the P99 meta is too heavily focused on Enchanter and is damaging the community. That's all. | |||
Last edited by azxten; 03-20-2021 at 12:42 PM..
|
|
|
|