#21
|
|||
|
Welp scrambled to protect the 3 I like the most. Lost some random ones. Oh well. Good luck yowl...
| ||
|
#22
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#23
|
|||
|
Seemed like they had a good thing going to seamlessly merge to blue with green/blue shared name pool. No one was really complaining (rare!)
Wonder if they shelved merge-to-blue plans, or if its a mess-up.. or just a "heck it" moment from the staff... or maybe they chose to open names on green/teal strategically late to minimize renames, while opening up freedom for the server? Seems weird though since we have like 3 years yet to create a big renaming headache for staff if so. Teal/Green is sharing fine, though | ||
Last edited by Magikarp; 11-04-2019 at 12:47 PM..
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
maybe green won't merge with blue
| ||
|
#25
|
|||
|
The restart just now addressed name linking - all green, teal, blue servers are now drawing from the same name pool, it appears.
| ||
|
#26
|
|||
|
What resolution occurred for duplicates on teal that exist on blue
| ||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#28
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#29
|
|||
|
You think? people spent hours making lvl 1s with "reserved" blue names on teal
| ||
|
#30
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|