So torn! (ROG/MNK)

[Cecily]

Low delay, low damage weapons are only nice for extra aggro and damage bonus. You can't dual wield super well at 20, and you have no damage bonus. Woodsman vs X has been argued quite a bit on this forum. Woodsman always wins. I don't care to prove this.

Jade Mace is better than a Lammy. Lupine Dagger is better than a Lammy. If you're gonna go against conventional knowledge grain, at least pick some better cheap(ish) weapons to dual wield.

[JayN]

play an iksar monk youll be much happier then playing any rogue.

I know I play both

[Smalls]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Low delay, low damage weapons are only nice for extra aggro and damage bonus. You can't dual wield super well at 20, and you have no damage bonus. Woodsman vs X has been argued quite a bit on this forum. Woodsman always wins. I don't care to prove this.

Jade Mace is better than a Lammy. Lupine Dagger is better than a Lammy. If you're gonna go against conventional knowledge grain, at least pick some better cheap(ish) weapons to dual wield.

Neither of those have Strength, Stamina, or HP.

[Cecily]

Which, of course, are the primary things you're looking to have on your damage dealing slots.

[Barkingturtle]

Nothing is sexy as a lammy.

[Smalls]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which, of course, are the primary things you're looking to have on your damage dealing slots.

If I'm gonna pick weapons, they're gonna be weapons with stats, not just raw damage/delay. And Lammies have good twink stats.

[Cecily]

That's the wrong priority for a DPS class [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stats are fairly meaningless in EQ. Get them on your other pieces. Otherwise you're just hurting your damage.

[Smalls]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's the wrong priority for a DPS class [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stats are fairly meaningless in EQ. Get them on your other pieces. Otherwise you're just hurting your damage.

Right, having Strength on a weapon, a stat that directly increases the overall damage you deal (how hard you hit and your accuracy) is meaningless.

[Cecily]

Yes it is.

[Smalls]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes it is.

9/19 with an extra 12 strength is gonna result in more overall damage than a 9/18 with no strength.