Why Harry Potter Should Have Carried A 1911

[margatroid]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

gotta start somewhere

Too bad you don't live near. I'd let you start with me. Something of a kink of mine.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by margatroid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Too bad you don't live near. I'd let you start with me. Something of a kink of mine.

lol

[mickmoranis]

lol no more straight sex without babies all women have to have them or else.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol no more straight sex without babies all women have to have them or else.

Weak b8, weakling.

[mickmoranis]

no abortions for your kids lol you suck loser

[mickmoranis]

i cant wait to watch liberals heads explode when we allow guns in schools.

you can say what you want about trump but he did more for conservatives in half his first term than obama did for democrats in all 8 of his.

shawining

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no abortions for your kids lol you suck loser

Weaker b8, weakling. You suck at fanfiction too, btw. Not surprising with how weak you are.

[bodenn]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence [sic] to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

It applies to civil cases as well. What does not apply to civil cases is "reasonable doubt". In civil cases "the preponderance of the evidence" is used to decide liability.

Neither criteria were meet with the hearings, therefore, innocents was assumed. This led to confirmation. Justice Kavanaugh could now be sued in a civil case, charged with a crime by law enforcement or more likely charged with impeachment by the house.

due process applies to all judicial actions.
This was not Judicial it was legislative.
Due process was still followed.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by bodenn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence [sic] to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

It applies to civil cases as well. What does not apply to civil cases is "reasonable doubt". In civil cases "the preponderance of the evidence" is used to decide liability.

Neither criteria were meet with the hearings, therefore, innocents was assumed. This led to confirmation. Justice Kavanaugh could now be sued in a civil case, charged with a crime by law enforcement or more likely charged with impeachment by the house.

due process applies to all judicial actions.
This was not Judicial it was legislative.
Due process was still followed.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jimjam]

It is thread had such an entertaining premise.

Harry Potter walks in and casts 1911 on you all.