PLAYER AGREEMENT: Unban CORE early

[Jimjam]

GMs doing a great job saving players from their worst excesses, but I just want people to play and have fun together.

Anyone else feel this way?

[Topgunben]

4th option - Bush burned the crime infested towers

[Swish2]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Swish2]

It's a double edged sword though isn't it. If you unban a guild early that sets an interesting precedent where the rules aren't really taken seriously.

This server and the enjoyment of rules at all levels.... there's a positive correlation there ^^

[Ghostly]

Originally Posted by Swish2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's a double edged sword though isn't it. If you unban a guild early that sets an interesting precedent where the rules aren't really taken seriously.

This server and the enjoyment of rules at all levels.... there's a positive correlation there ^^

Is it really unbanning a guild early if its blatantly obvious the ban was overkill in the first place though? Technically its just bringing the ban back to where it should be.

[Swish2]

Originally Posted by Ghostly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is it really unbanning a guild early if its blatantly obvious the ban was overkill in the first place though? Technically its just bringing the ban back to where it should be.

That isn't what people will remember.

People will remember that a guild got taken off a ban early (the rest being smallprint/unimportant)...and therefore there's a chance whatever the circumstances that a guild banned in the future can expect to have a verdict overturned on that basis.

[Ghostly]

Originally Posted by Swish2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That isn't what people will remember.

People will remember that a guild got taken off a ban early (the rest being smallprint/unimportant)...and therefore there's a chance whatever the circumstances that a guild banned in the future can expect to have a verdict overturned on that basis.

You're right, the right thing definitely shouldn't be done because other people may try to take advantage of the GM's. Totally makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

[Culainn]

I voted for all 3

[Sonderbeast]

Winchester = against naming policy
Turdburglerr = totally fine

Also totally fine = negative RaP

connection???

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Culainn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I voted for all 3