#321
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#322
|
|||
|
To be fair to samoht dain is mentioned, at the very end, 3 years after the post he tries to cite as proof that there's some kind of rule against lull pulling (there isn't). To be fair to you he is a really dense moron.
What he's asking everyone in this thread to do is focus on 1 sentence and remove all context with which it was posted and ignore the thread it was posted in. That's not how language works and that's not how reading works. Context is king and in this case samoht is a lowly court jester. | ||
|
#323
|
|||
|
Two response from two different idiots. One refuses to read the page they copy/pasted, and the other acknowledges that it does include dain specific rules, but still will not concede that the thread includes dain specific rules.
This is why nobody can get along with Riot. They're full of this kind of rules lawyer who are absolutely wrong in their rules lawyering, but they refuse to even acknowledge that they might be wrong. These people clearly cannot be reasoned with. They are a blight to the server and need to be removed from the raid scene. | ||
|
#324
|
|||
|
Samoht, in his wormtongued argument believes that the removal of one rule "06-14-21 update: Removed max runners for Kael/Dain" applies.
And Samoht argues that the removal of rules " 6/16/2017 Removed all ToV, Tormax, and Statue rules." does not apply. This is two-faced, and part of Trainquish's MO. | ||
|
#325
|
|||
|
Wait, so does the thread include dain rules or not?
Because your entire argument was that it did not. Are you acknowledging your argument was a farse? | ||
|
#326
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
#327
|
|||
|
Couple more pages of feverish posting and I'm positive one of you is going to convince the other that you were right and they were wrong.
| ||
|
#328
|
|||
|
so mad
| ||
|
#329
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Now that we know that the thread did in fact include dain specific rules, the ruling can be applied to dain, and both the title of the thread and your argument so far are confirmed to be irrelevant. So what you have established so far: 1) Sirken's footrace FTE ruling that forbids use of lull can apply to dain 2) Riot broke this rule on 4/17 3) Riot has not utilized this tactic since then in passive acknowledgement that it is in fact against the rules. Let's move on now to other documented instances of rules Riot has clearly broken: Quote:
Any objections to these as they are laid out? I'm sure that you've got something imaginative to senselessly defend your guild on these indefensible situations. If one thing is clear, though, it's obvious that Riot is not any more noble than their opponents on this server. There's nothing shadier than a bunch of shady mother fuckers pretending they're not shady. | ||||
|
#330
|
|||
|
I want to fit in so I'd like to declare that I'm also EXTREMELY upset that a rival elf league hasn't interpreted the mystical beast slaying rules appendix volume xvii the same way as me, which could theoretically lead to me getting least magical treasure.
| ||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|