Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-23-2020, 07:56 PM
Psyborg Psyborg is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fammaden [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What if we decided to rotate on our own? They gonna force people to fight over shit?
No but they won’t enforce a rotation which means any guild that forms, dissolves, or simply chooses to break the agreement can do so at any time. For this reason and for the sake of competition (make fun of me all you want), AG and Freedom have independently come to the conclusion that we do not want to be part of any sweeping rotation. Tunare, Ring War, Fear Golems, maybe ST golems is about as far as we want to take it. Riot is the guild pushing hardest for a full rotation, much to my surprise. They believe it’s in the best interest of the server and we believe it will harm it. Gotta find a way to keep it competitive without burdening GMs with petitions. It’s the only way forward.
  #22  
Old 10-23-2020, 08:20 PM
Croco Croco is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyborg [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No but they won’t enforce a rotation which means any guild that forms, dissolves, or simply chooses to break the agreement can do so at any time. For this reason and for the sake of competition (make fun of me all you want), AG and Freedom have independently come to the conclusion that we do not want to be part of any sweeping rotation. Tunare, Ring War, Fear Golems, maybe ST golems is about as far as we want to take it. Riot is the guild pushing hardest for a full rotation, much to my surprise. They believe it’s in the best interest of the server and we believe it will harm it. Gotta find a way to keep it competitive without burdening GMs with petitions. It’s the only way forward.
Whether or not it helps or harms the server depends on who you want to cater to. Rotating is classic, so is not rotating. Do you want to cater to the people who get off on denying people pixels and will bend/break any rule they possibly can to the point where if you are in a high end raid guild you absolutely have to have at least one if not multiple people running OBS at all times to catch the misdeeds?

Or do you want to cater to the people who are in favor of something the vast majority of the server is in favor of? This game is over 20 years old. Virtually none of us are in our teens/20's anymore. We're mostly in our 30's-40's and older and we have lives, families, pets, and responsibilities. We don't care if guild X happens to get the same pixels as us. It doesn't devalue our accomplishments. The powers that be have fostered a server meta that has caused the troubles the raid scene is now experiencing.

At some point you have to ask yourself "Am I the problem?" and when it comes to how the server is run I believe that's a resounding yes. I applaud Menden, Galach, and Medris for stepping up and finally doing something about it.
  #23  
Old 10-23-2020, 08:28 PM
Hisamori Hisamori is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 206
Default

No need to decide between rotation or FTE when we can just delete blue.
  #24  
Old 10-23-2020, 08:32 PM
enjchanter enjchanter is offline
Planar Protector

enjchanter's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,610
Default

The cycle just repeats over and over

Guild 2 struggles vs current top guild
Guild 2 gains momentum
Top guild doesnt like that / rule change ensues
Guild 2 starts competing both america and euro hours
Infighting eats at top guild
Top crumbles / reforms / rebrands as no. 2 guild
Restart
__________________
Eberron 60 Erudite Enchanter
Enjamin 60 Erudite Cleric
Yxarus 60 Iksar Warrior Retired
Fauvana 60 Erudite Necromancer
Erjav 60 Human Bard
Enjamini 60 Human Magician
Deepwalter 60 Erudite Paladin
Seliel 60 Human Rogue
Enjoii 54 Dark Elf Warrior
  #25  
Old 10-23-2020, 08:32 PM
Psyborg Psyborg is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Croco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Whether or not it helps or harms the server depends on who you want to cater to. Rotating is classic, so is not rotating. Do you want to cater to the people who get off on denying people pixels and will bend/break any rule they possibly can to the point where if you are in a high end raid guild you absolutely have to have at least one if not multiple people running OBS at all times to catch the misdeeds?

Or do you want to cater to the people who are in favor of something the vast majority of the server is in favor of? This game is over 20 years old. Virtually none of us are in our teens/20's anymore. We're mostly in our 30's-40's and older and we have lives, families, pets, and responsibilities. We don't care if guild X happens to get the same pixels as us. It doesn't devalue our accomplishments. The powers that be have fostered a server meta that has caused the troubles the raid scene is now experiencing.

At some point you have to ask yourself "Am I the problem?" and when it comes to how the server is run I believe that's a resounding yes. I applaud Menden, Galach, and Medris for stepping up and finally doing something about it.
I can appreciate that many would like rotations. I used to be in the same boat until I got a taste of competing and the bore that was instanced raiding in Classic WoW. I truly do have a all the empathy in the world for people who would like full rotations, which is why my compromise is a mix. I can only speak for myself and guild mates who share my view. Rotating is not fun and would make me want to stop playing. I enjoy competing against other guilds for kills with high stakes. I’m sure most of the server wouldn’t enjoy it but they have clearly found other ways to remain happy on the server. I believe it’s possible to compete without burdening the GMs and I have every intention of fighting for a solution that does that. I’d be happy to outline what I think I a logical approach.
  #26  
Old 10-23-2020, 09:41 PM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,730
Default

All due respect to Rogean and Nilbog, but why? More specifically, why not both? Leave the recycle servers for competition, make the beta server the place for people to retire in peace and quiet and rotations.


Anyway, what's to stop casual guilds from turning the tables and holding the raid scene hostage with incessant raid petitions until the GMs get fed up and decide competition is a bad thing? Not advocating this, but the gate swings both ways.
  #27  
Old 10-23-2020, 09:51 PM
feanan feanan is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 425
Default

blue, where "competing" means how many fully buffed raid forces you can camp around the various targets.

the toxic raid scene has made a lot more people quit than the 10% who would quit if we just had enforced rotations or whatever
  #28  
Old 10-23-2020, 10:05 PM
Solist Solist is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 656
Default

You're delusional if you think any other guild full of people would be any different. The raid guilds are the most casual guilds in many ways. And they're just full of every day normal people. TSS is a far more hostile environment than riot or freedom.
  #29  
Old 10-23-2020, 10:22 PM
Tunabros Tunabros is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2018
Location: California, United States
Posts: 3,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No sorry
  #30  
Old 10-24-2020, 12:18 AM
Shac Shac is offline
Kobold

Shac's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 132
Default

just enforce a strict system for a month and then they wont take it for granted
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.