Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2018, 10:55 AM
Trelaboon Trelaboon is offline
Fire Giant

Trelaboon's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 929
Default Did Pally/SK change much in luclin and beyond?

I main a Paladin here on p99. Knights are easily my favorite class, but at 60, their usefulness is pretty limited. There are obviously niche uses for each of the two knights (DA pulling, train up etc), but the role which they’re actually suited for (Tanking) becomes pretty impossible. I’ve tanked in HoT, I’ve ramp tanked Vindi, but I’ll never stand toe to toe with any raid mob, short of an absolute crisis.

I played live up until OoW, but I don’t really remember much about the game during that time. Did Paladin and Shadowknight ever become suited for raid tanking? What was their role after Luclin?
  #2  
Old 10-04-2018, 10:59 AM
XeroKill XeroKill is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 81
Default

They became defacto off tanks, and may raid encounters were specifically designed around having knights off tank multiple adds. I am looking at you Rathe Council! The warrior never lost their unique role as THE raid tank for progression content, but the gap did narrow significantly with AA and better gearing in Luclin and beyond. After Luclin, our typical raid tank setup was: If it NEEDS defensive, then the warriors tank it and everything else is done with Knights for their superior agro control for superior DPS.
  #3  
Old 10-04-2018, 12:59 PM
Crede Crede is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,982
Default

Yea with all the scripted raids you weren't winning without good knights. SKs had AOE aggro spells which were really powerful. We didn't have many pallies, but they were always offtanking as well. Not to mention pallies epic 2.0 was the first weapon I believe to break 100 base damage which looked badass too.
  #4  
Old 10-04-2018, 04:41 PM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,271
Default

Class balance among tanks in EQ was never ideal because the tank classes had fundamental faults with their basic designs that were never properly addressed. The knight classes had their ups and downs. During Luclin and Planes knights had their heyday, but Warriors (being the delicate snowflakes they tend to be) screamed and threw temper tantrums until the squeaky (and whiny) wheel got the grease, the pendulum swung the other way, and by Gates of Discord the knights had their collective backs broken. I quit shortly thereafter for good so I can't say what came next.

Overall, I can live with Velious class balance insofar as the tank classes go. It's not perfect but each of the three has its own area where it performs decently. Knights are plenty useful at 60--I've been 60 on my SK for years and I remain well satisfied with it--just got to remember that there's more to the game than logging in for raids. Hybrid anything is going to be weak in a situation where you have multiple specialists present for any given job.

Danth
  #5  
Old 10-04-2018, 05:39 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,751
Default

In the early years after velious (luclin + a half dozen expansions) knights became a lot more capable but still lacked defensive disciplines. Raid roles did expand quite a bit but warriors still got the high profile tanking jobs.

Eventually class roles were blurred to the point that all classes ended up with some form of fd vs fading memories style aggro dump and all tanks had their own flavor of defensive. All priests became capable healers making clerics less of a “male or break” class.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #6  
Old 10-04-2018, 06:20 PM
pasi pasi is offline
Planar Protector

pasi's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,077
Default

Wall of text from guy with lots of time invested on SK:

Group content was where knights shined, but EQ never really placed much of an emphasis on that. You can point to the prenerf Ikkinz Trials or MPG Trials, but those weren't exactly stonewalling (pun intended) warriors.

From a raiding perspective, knights were shit from Luclin to when I quit for the first time in OoW. Every so often there would be a mob that would AE fear (i.e Innoruuk/CT) where a knight with fearless could be an option, but it was still probably better to just use a warrior.

Even if a knight outgeared the content, they're were pretty trash relative to a warrior. It's a similar situation to Clerics and Druids, but the issue is that additional healing stacked whereas tanking did not. A Vex-Thal geared warrior is going to be a far better tank for a highend raid mob than a PoTime geared Knight due to having evasive/defensive.

And despite knights having amazing threat generation, they lacked an ability like AE-taunt that would 100% put them on top of the aggro list for surefire tank switches.

Knights also lacked an ability for burst damage avoidance for when they did manage to get aggro. Even rangers had this in weapon-shield. This is pretty vital for establishing a CH chain or slowing/debuffing a target.

Anyhow, in terms of additional roles:

SKs (imo) were the worst class in the game from a raiding perspective. IMO, they shared a spot with bards for the best pulling class in the game until they made monks even more idiot proof in GoD. SKs received a single target aggro buff and a hate line of spells that basically didn't work until OoW. They could generate a small amount of group mana with Zev Bite in PoP and a moderate amount with the addition of a separate cooldown Ancient Bite in GoD. They also had a decent group ATK buff. Generally the classes that wanted mana didn't want ATK and visa versa. While their threat generation was still good, it didn't really become great until OoW fixed the terror line. SKs spam clinging darkness from the DC/SV nerfs until the OoW terror line.

Paladins just offered so much more than SKs outside of pulling.

Paladins became arguably the best rampage tank given DA hammer (as long as they weren't an idiot with it since it blocks heals too). Decent group healing and single-target spot healing. Still maintained the Brells role. Paladins generally had higher HP since their self-buff (Aura of the Crusader) stacked with Aegolism line whereas SK's self-buff (Cloak of Shadows) did not stack with Aegolism or Symbol+Druid until much later.
__________________
  #7  
Old 10-04-2018, 06:49 PM
Jan Jensen Jan Jensen is offline
Kobold

Jan Jensen's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 157
Default

SKs became AoE agro monsters. They were simply outstanding in scenarios where heal agro actually meant something (ie., not p99 broken mechanics).
  #8  
Old 10-05-2018, 05:14 AM
Yasi Yasi is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 237
Default

Maybe I'm confusing something but I remember paladins on raids healing (somewhere around Planes of Power)?
  #9  
Old 10-05-2018, 03:25 PM
Nulek Nulek is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 80
Default

Well, when gnomes were an optional race the world was better for it.
  #10  
Old 10-05-2018, 06:00 PM
Glain Glain is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 98
Default

I never played a main tank. But in eq that title should go to the warrior. Pre luclin, knights are pretty useless because raids don't really require off tanking from hybrids. Just need a few good wars
__________________
Glain: 60 Rogue
Raor: 52 Shaman
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.