Quote:
Originally Posted by skarlorn
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yea thats the only time he says that I've found
|
Well I only saw two videos of the guy and that was one of them. Its like -- he doing so god damn well -- and then flies off the handle about trans protestors being similar to Maoists -- like anything collectivist oriented...
This lead me to believe he did not really understand Maoism that well. Not to mention politics in general. Republicans often -- at best -- Think someone like Chris Hayes is a representative of a "liberal" and thus leftwing American. Some douchebag getting paid like $20,000+ a day to pitch Russiagate stories and ignore subjects like:
1) Americas ultra warmongering foreign policy, egged on by the military industrial complex which includes our mainstream media (including Fox/Brietbart).
2) Individual billionaires commanding vast swaths of the government like Kochs (Paul Ryan), Soros (Funds Identity Politics Movements), Bezos (Military-Industrial Complex and owns the WaPo), Zuckerberg (Face Book is Nacy Pelosi's top contributor), you name it.
3) A complete lack of commitment to any serious action about environmental damage. Not even good faith efforts to encourage green energy.
4) Corporate America closing its clutches on the internet...They plan to monetize all that we currently have access to for free or near it. Comcast owns MSNBC and Pays Maddow/Hayes/Matthews et al. very well.
So Hayes is not a leftwing American. Perhaps "liberal" is an appropriate term for these people. That label means "economic liberal" all over the world except in America where they try to mind-fuck the left into supporting unfettered capitalism. So going foward calling these moderate Republicans like Bill Maher, Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow "Liberals" might not be a bad idea.
They are not representative of the working/middle class left however.