jet fuel does melt steel beams

[Madbad]

BUT, WHAT ABOUT NANO-THERMITE!

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is BDA not in the dictionary?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Kyff]

As someone has already pointed out apllying jet fuel to steel structures doesn't do any harm. However, filling a steel structure up with jet fuel and then setting it ablaze will certainly melt the steel.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Kyff [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As someone has already pointed out apllying jet fuel to steel structures doesn't do any harm. However, filling a steel structure up with jet fuel and then setting it ablaze will certainly melt the steel.

lol it wont cause the superstructure to rhythmically implode a few synchronized floors at a time.

Talk to the eyewitnesses who escaped the floor that the plane actually crashed into, plenty of survivors interviewed and verified who worked on those floors who escaped and theres no evidence the structure was compromised.

No engineer will agree with synchronized floor collapse either buddy. the building would fall to one side or the other, not fall straight down...

Try again.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by jcr4990 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's not a sufficient word in the english language to describe the level of stupidity required to be a 9/11 truther

lol what do you want pal, I didn't create the laws of physics

[Swish]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol it wont cause the superstructure to rhythmically implode a few synchronized floors at a time.

Talk to the eyewitnesses who escaped the floor that the plane actually crashed into, plenty of survivors interviewed and verified who worked on those floors who escaped and theres no evidence the structure was compromised.

No engineer will agree with synchronized floor collapse either buddy. the building would fall to one side or the other, not fall straight down...

Try again.

Also the lead architect for the towers disappeared soon after. Probably a coincidence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Filthy_Pagan]

Originally Posted by Xaanka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

there were also other things burning inside the towers than jet fuel. jet fuel burns at 1500*F and recorded temps were over 1800*F in the wtc fires.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

doesnt take a rocket surgeon

You're absolutely right.

but the demo charges certainly helped bring the towers down. They were placed in the building when the 'elevators needed maintenance' and there was a crew of 'technicians' there just a few months prior FOR 6 MONTHS.

Also, tower 7. Lets not forget tower 7. It magically fell while everyone was looking up. Didn't even catch shrapnel from the other ones.

[Filthy_Pagan]

And larry silverstein bought the towers right before it happened and took out something like a 3.5 BILLION insurance policy on them that covered 'terrorist attacks' specifically.

riddle me that one, too.

[-TK-]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also the lead architect for the towers disappeared soon after. Probably a coincidence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Conspiracy or not, I'd disappear too if I was constantly being harassed by every wanna-be conspiracy theorist looking to gain some e-fame. Most likely just simple cause and effect on that one. Not everyone is looking for that kind of attention.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No engineer will agree with synchronized floor collapse either buddy. the building would fall to one side or the other, not fall straight down...

This is why I've remained skeptical of the official narrative. The amount of logistical planning and liability insurance that goes into bringing down a high rise is staggering. To have a random application of applied force achieve the same results is almost beyond belief, but not entirely.