******Official politics thread ******

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

are you so deep down the reddit hole that noone can dislike trump/supporters without you memeing about it?

yes

they're bots tho so thanks for the bite

are you so deep down the libtard hole all you can do is make up fantastical personal attacks?

yes

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

are you so deep down the libtard hole all you can do is make up fantastical personal attacks?

yes

are you saying it's unfair to hold all magamans responsible for spreading the pizzagate/sethrich conspiracies?

[mickmoranis]

unfair is a word only libcucks use

[Domo]

unfair is a word only libcucks use

sounds like facebook philosophy o_O

[Raavak]

Libtards starting to use the term "whataboutism" when they get busted on their hypocrisy and dual standards.

example:
Libtard: Trump isn't empathetic enough about the plight of the Texans suffering from flooding! Just visiting Texas and making speeches. Where are the hugs?!
joe blow: What about Obama, he didn't even mention the BP oil spill for almost 2 weeks after it happened?
Libtard: That's just an whataboutism, you racist Nazi capitalist pig.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Libtards starting to use the term "whataboutism" when they get busted on their hypocrisy and dual standards.

example:
Libtard: Trump isn't empathetic enough about the plight of the Texans suffering from flooding! Just visiting Texas and making speeches. Where are the hugs?!
joe blow: What about Obama, he didn't even mention the BP oil spill for almost 2 weeks after it happened?
Libtard: That's just an whataboutism, you racist Nazi capitalist pig.

a fair criticism if a biased example. irrelevant objections aren't useful. redhats control all three branches but answer every criticism with crap like 'but Hillary's emails'. neither clinton or obama are president now and never will be. govern or get lost.

[Raavak]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

a fair criticism if a biased example. irrelevant objections aren't useful. redhats control all three branches but answer every criticism with crap like 'but Hillary's emails'. neither clinton or obama are president now and never will be. govern or get lost.

There are plenty of examples of differing standards being used for different people in the same positions. The same standards apply to all equally. There is never a "but...". This is logic. You can debate it, but you will lose points.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are plenty of examples of differing standards being used for different people in the same positions. The same standards apply to all equally. There is never a "but...". This is logic. You can debate it, but you will lose points.

it sounds like you're complaining about fairness

[Raavak]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it sounds like you're complaining about fairness

Complaining is done for emotional reasons. I don't have emotions (autistic). I state reasoning.

Diversion is a debate tactic used invalidly when taking an indefensible position. Ad hominem.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Complaining is done for emotional reasons. I don't have emotions (autistic). I state reasoning.

Diversion is a debate tactic used invalidly when taking an indefensible position. Ad hominem.

if u wanna barf the dictionary at each other we can play that game. im just alliterally asking melon on a date anyway.

we can ride the bumper boats