#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
I haven't spent as much time in Seb, only because i prefer HS for all the undead. You need to look at this logically man. I can guarantee you my necro pet will out damage any gains that a Melee would get from haste during the journey to 60. On top of that the melee won't be getting hit, so absolutely no need for heals, and necro can spot heal if need be. At 44 with pact of shadow, healing is so efficient it's unbelievable. Necro can split with FD, and has a good/great charm of undead. Shaman is lacking in charm department No I am not saying in literally every instance a necro is better than a shaman. But for the average melee, necro is going to get them from 1 to 50+ much faster.
__________________
I like you guys, I really do.
| |||
|
#12
|
|||
|
Duoing necro with melee really deserves its own thread, this is about mage + priest, remember?
From 55 the necro becomes a very effective healer. I used to duo with a Necromancer on my ranger doing hands in KC. Not fear kiting; tank and spank. There is a lot of synergy between a well geared ranger and a necro 55+. | ||
|
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
but i digress
__________________
I like you guys, I really do.
| |||
|
#14
|
|||
|
If I was picking a mage + ?priest duo for 1-60, then Shaman for sure.
The earth pet tricked out with mage summoned items + shaman buffs is a pretty stout tank, and every mob coming in will have the harshest debuffs in the game. None of the priests has true CC, but shaman are about as good at offtank CC as it gets. And at 60, the shaman is win. And for min/max, make a troll shman of Innoruuk. Clickie snare to cover that deficiency, plus regen for Canni. IMHO, YMMV. | ||
|
#15
|
|||
|
1-39 shaman for sure... send in fire pet + spam inner fire = easy mode
| ||
|
|
|