#421
|
|||
|
Well if they have removed castng from them they should be pre-nerf strength because that too is classic.
__________________
Zalion 45 Mage - Barragrom 21 Ranger - Cxynosees 16 Druid
| ||
|
#422
|
||||
|
Quote:
I got you fam. https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...93#post3011693 | |||
|
#423
|
|||
|
I like how extensive research was done to prevent mages from getting 24+ pets, and the bugs that relate to that were conveniently ignored.
| ||
|
#425
|
||||
|
Quote:
Check out how the forums responded, nobody listened. Baler tried his hardest to derail my thread. You neckbeards were warned, nobody listened. You are also lucky pets can cast spells at all. You want to play a mage? Deal with how it was in classic. I personally had the time of my life playing mage (1-24) from March - May 99. Grouped the most I've ever grouped, got to meet tons of cool people. Verant wanted to make EQ as much as a grouping experience as possible. That may just be why mages functioned the way they did at launch (aka "broke" to most of you sour patches here). | |||
Last edited by skorge; 11-03-2019 at 09:39 AM..
|
|
#426
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#427
|
||||
|
Quote:
You've advocated in post after post, lobbying for every Mage NERF, whilst conveniently ignoring every Classic change that would increase their strength. In fact lets get you and Dolalin a corner and y'all two can just take turns defecating in each other's mouth! | |||
|
#428
|
|||
|
Selectively classic. Thats how P99 rolls. They deliberatly ignore some classic to make game more balanced.
I have no opinion in whether it is good or not. But they do. | ||
|
#429
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#430
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician The Drift | |||
|
|
|