#131
|
|||
|
Also, LOL at how many people can't realize this is a troll. God damn. Some good ol red con trolling here.
| ||
|
#132
|
|||
|
After reaching the last page it dawned on me that I skipped OP's post due to length but read 14 pages worth of comments with no break.
I played myself... | ||
|
#133
|
|||
|
Someone summarize OP in one sentence
| ||
|
#135
|
||||
|
Quote:
I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to explain why credentialism is a failed philosophy. (Hint: It's because it denies the realities of human nature and teaches that terrorism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves.) According to the latest claims, if HopefulButConcerned101 would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to ensure that everyone knows that muting the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against HopefulButConcerned101 is a mug's game. The only reason he does things like that is because the emphasis his cajoleries place on personal victimization includes a refusal to hold obdurate, vapid dissemblers in any way responsible for their actions. Nevertheless, when it comes to accepting or rebuking his primitive, unruly missives, we are faced with the same choice that Moses gave Israel: good or evil, light or dark, life or death, freedom or slavery. One shouldn't need to think too hard about those options to realize that HopefulButConcerned101's ability to capitalize on the economic chaos, racial tensions, and social discontent of the current historical moment can be explained in large part by the following. HopefulButConcerned101's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. Was HopefulButConcerned101 just trying to be cute when he said that he was there in Everquest when Leeroy did what he did? I sure hope so because if I am correctly informed, he always represents himself as the victim, as betrayed and sinned against, demeaned and tormented because of society's jealousy. In any case, a large number of people, myself included, figured HopefulButConcerned101 would never stoop so low as to institutionalize collectivism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. Nevertheless, despite some progressive words and symbolic gestures, he chose to do exactly that. As a result, I can safely say that HopefulButConcerned101 champions deconstructionism, exploitation, and imperialist war. That said, let me continue. If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less dishonest than HopefulButConcerned101. I have some of his incoherent press releases in front of me right now. In one of them, HopefulButConcerned101 avouches that he's the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. If you don't find that shocking then consider that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that it is an indisputable verity that I myself find HopefulButConcerned101's failed attempts to sacrifice children on the twin altars of elitism and greed mildly amusing. I was right when I said that my concern and outrage are not directed solely at HopefulButConcerned101, but at all those who seek to trick us into trading freedom for serfdom. And I was right when I said that I do not find press releases that are libidinous, discourteous, and vain to be “funny”. Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe HopefulButConcerned101 avows that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. One of the enduring effects of HopefulButConcerned101's polemics is the way they will impose hypocritical new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of morally reprehensible drive for power. Not only does HopefulButConcerned101 use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets, but he then commands his drudges, “Go, and do thou likewise.” Don't let yourself be buffaloed by him. Don't let yourself be persuaded to believe that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully just because a lot of philopolemical coofs happen to believe that. Analyze the arguments for yourself and see if you agree with my claim that HopefulButConcerned101 may unwittingly rob, steal, cheat, and murder. I say “unwittingly” because he is apparently unaware that he operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why HopefulButConcerned101 has abandoned ethics altogether. Disguised in this drollery is an important message: Conspiracy theories are HopefulButConcerned101's bread and butter, and the wilder, the better. His most outré claim is that everyone who scrambles aboard the HopefulButConcerned101 bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. This claim sets a new standard for daffy, querulous tracts and shows how HopefulButConcerned101 has never had a single new idea. He has merely gussied up old concepts in new rhetoric, most recently in the meretricious jargon of cannibalism. This leads to an important point: I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, lazy world run by rash, shambolic moochers. It doesn't really matter why HopefulButConcerned101 wants to rot out the foundations of our values. Whether it's due to a misplaced faith in WoW, bribes paid to HopefulButConcerned101 by rude, indelicate malcontents, or nagging from some of the chuffy, gutless loons in his club, the fact remains that that's what HopefulButConcerned101 wants. What I want, in contrast, is to notify you that while he's out conscripting traditional academic disciplines into the service of prætorianism and its ideological variants, the general public is shouldering the bill. Sadly, this is a bill of shattered minds, broken hearts and homes, depression and all its attendant miseries, and a despondency about HopefulButConcerned101's attempts to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of obscurantism. I am not going to go into too great a detail about eccentric, incorrigible wantwits, but be assured that his assumptions are matched in their untenability only by the arrogant fervor with which they are held. In the presence of high heaven and before the civilized world I therefore assert that every time he utters or writes a statement that supports Chekism—even indirectly—it sends a message that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. I avow that we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because it shocks my conscience to see him scorn and abjure reason, but primarily because he has been trying for quite some time to convince us that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to nurture and spread totalitarianism in our nation's heartland. I suggest he take this rotting ordure and dump it where he and his fellow homicidal dunces congregate. At least then we could keep our priorities in check without having to worry that he will lower scholastic standards. HopefulButConcerned101 has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but HopefulButConcerned101 says that he wants to make life better for everyone. Lacking a coherent ideology, however, HopefulButConcerned101 always ends up making our lives miserable. He claims that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist. There is a war being fought in the unseen realm between the forces of good and evil, and the battlefield is your mind. The only way for us to win this war is to produce a compelling model of a society worth struggling for. In the absence of such a model, churlish tosspots typically retreat into specific cultural and ideological identity groups that make rights, status, and privilege claims on the basis of a victimized identity. If you think that HopefulButConcerned101 isn't planning on exploiting such identity groups, then consider that this whole discussion has turned into a war of words between a few people. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, HopefulButConcerned101's cold-blooded swampers like to shout, “Let's doctor evidence and classification systems and make hubristic generalizations to support haughty, preconceived views. That'll be wonderful. Hooray, hooray!” But that won't be wonderful. Rather, it'll organize a troika of base-minded yahoos, moralistic pipsqueaks, and batty scoundrels with the sole purpose of dissolving the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. Many people respond to HopefulButConcerned101's lily-livered schemes in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we teach people that HopefulButConcerned101 indisputably wants me to go into hiding. If I did, I'm sure the chortles from HopefulButConcerned101 and his lynch mob would be rich and prolonged, especially given how HopefulButConcerned101 has been implementing a disingenuous parody of justice called “HopefulButConcerned101-ism”. Should doing so buy HopefulButConcerned101 the right to dialogue, negotiation, concessions, and power? I say no because I would love to debate HopefulButConcerned101 about his views on immoralism. Alas, given how ill-prepared he is to win such a debate, he's been trying to suppress the debate before it can even occur. Such behavior tells us that HopefulButConcerned101 is a distasteful hedonist. Consequently, attempting to respond to his effusions with logic is futile. A more productive response is to observe that HopefulButConcerned101 is an expert at calming his opponents with sweet inversions of the truth. In case you don't believe me, consider how he has managed to convince an alarming number of people that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. He does this even though he knows full well that he claims to have data supporting his assertion that he's God's chosen instrument to save our nation from impending doom. Naturally, he insists that he can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that he's hiding something. Maybe he's hiding the fact that a free and open society should be able to tolerate a diversity of beliefs and practices, even when they are at odds with his contemptible ruminations—perhaps especially when they are at odds with his contemptible ruminations. Finally, any mistakes in this message are strictly my fault. But if you find any factual error or have more updated information on the subject of Mr. HopefulButConcerned101, HopefulButConcerned101-inspired versions of authoritarianism, etc., please tell me so we can discuss and debate. | |||
|
#136
|
|||
|
Concerned shitizen.
| ||
|
#137
|
|||
|
Please refrain from fully-quoting the OP. Thanks!
| ||
|
#139
|
|||
|
i read the first sentence and realized this dude must be new to the community for 3 reasons..His post seemed genuine, overall post length, and it felt like they thought they'd be taken seriously in the RnF section of these forums.
These are the things I, a warrior of the 60th circle, have observed. | ||
|
|
|