|
View Poll Results: What do you think will happen? | |||
The USA will buy the UK to make them great again | 15 | 14.02% | |
The monarchy will collapse, England to become Venezuela 2.0 | 10 | 9.35% | |
UK to sink in total recession, AM/Riot to rejoice about this new stream of jobless apps | 25 | 23.36% | |
The UK will do just fine, will claim back USA, India, Australia and all other ex colonies | 23 | 21.50% | |
The EU will make Boris Johnson fuck a pig live on TV, or they kill Harry | 19 | 17.76% | |
Bush // towers | 39 | 36.45% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
The biggest problem is the UK is forbidden to negotiate with other countries until it has left the EU.
It's pretty dumb. I believe I mentioned a few pages back; The first thing the UK should have negotiated is an exemption to that rule, so they could prospectively make trade deals with other countries before leaving the EU. The rule was written with a mind for countries remaining in EU, not leaving, so isn't appropriate for UK to observe it. The EU would hold a lot less bargaining chips if the UK was able to circumvent that rule. Which is why I suppose they are so strict to enforce it. As to starving? Britain was not set up logistically for international import/export rules. The import of food and medicine relied on no borders. Apparently a lot of work has gone into upping processing on both sides of the border, so while still problematic exiting on WTO rules wouldn't be quite as much of a disaster. If we could leave Europe without sacrificing rights (except perhaps freedom of movement - one of the biggest selling points of Brexit was control of borders), do it at the start of 2020 (lets let those pending tax laws sting dodgy billionaires) and be able to have prenegotiated trade deals with blocs apart from just EU that would be great. If shit hits fan, I'm just gonna retire to one of my Greek island residences *BIG SIP*. | ||
|
#124
|
|||||
|
Quote:
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...markets-230164 https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/b...rump-wins.html https://money.cnn.com/2016/06/06/new...larry-summers/ "Summers argues that the "Trump risk" is a lot more dangerous than the "Brexit risk" (the British referendum vote on June 23 on whether to leave the European Union) that has received so much attention." ""If Mr. Trump did even half of what he has promised, he would surely set off the worst trade war since the Great Depression," he wrote" https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...onomic-fallout "So we are very probably looking at a global recession, with no end in sight. I suppose we could get lucky somehow. But on economics, as on everything else, a terrible thing has just happened." The real effect, I guess we got lucky- https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/...ew-series-low/ U.S. Unemployment Rate Remains at Near-Historic Low of 3.7 Percent; African-American Unemployment Rate Hits New Series Low https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...rship-n2553266 Quote:
| ||||
Last edited by Teppler; 09-19-2019 at 11:52 PM..
|
|
#125
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#126
|
|||
|
wrongness isn't predictive, u boner
| ||
|
#127
|
|||
|
Completely different situation of hypothetical 'racists voting for trump' to hypothetical situation 'racists voting for Brexit'.
Trump has shifted around trade terms a bit, Britain is going to have changed trade terms and border policy with every country in the world. Also strip away all sorts of human and workers rights. Britain's biggest sector is financial. Maybe dodging EU anti tax loophole laws will actually save the economy. Perhaps it runs on corruption and opaque accounts. | ||
|
#128
|
|||
|
Imagine if Trump was stopped from assuming presidency by the senate/congress because he would probably tank the economy.
| ||
|
#129
|
|||
|
More like the electoral colleges. It's their job to chose the president, right? The people voting is what informs their decision.
Parliament doing its job of representing their constituents. Of course circa 48% are going to be pro remain. That's the entire point of democratic representation. The other 52% should be working on ensuring a Brexit is delivered as it was promoted by campaigners; easiest deal ever and definitely not no deal. | ||
|
|
|