<Brexit>

[Wonkie]

UK is akshually a constitutional theocratic monarchy. the one sovereign is God and He is represented on this plane by the Queen/King, serving as Vicar.

the people are subjects, not sovereign

Change my mind

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It’s always this type of mega cucked bullshit coming out of there that it’s been a lost cause forever. And I’m clearly more upset about it than anyone I’ve actually seen living there.

Those LGBT losers and their throbbing, massive black pills.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The fact that you look at it as winners and losers says a lot about you.

The fact that you think people own a share of a yes/no vote they lost says a lot as well.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Those LGBT losers and their throbbing, massive black pills.

Looks like you have a new favorite phrase. Black pill black pill black pill black pill. Want to make another post about it?

[Horza]

I guess we just share a common fetish.

[Thrombosis]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yea, it is those pushing for the no deal Brexit that are 'pushing hard for MPs to do something illegal'. Using an advisory referendum to dictate government policy, reneging on the Good Friday Agreement, airy fairy campaign promises (the two worst offenders for having made these are the head of the privy council and the PM: two men in the best positions to implement these unkept promises - but nope)... All of these things are at best of dubious legality.

So your hypothetical situation is what we are seeing now except the situation is flipped and the condom is on the other cock.

There's absolutely nothing illegal about a no-deal, clean-break Brexit. In fact, the opposite is true - it's the law - Article 50 states once a member state invokes A50, they have two years to negotiate a deal, after that they're out unless it's revoked or the conditions for an extension are met. Similarly there's nothing in the Good Friday Agreement that states the UK (or RoIreland for that matter) have to stay members of the EU.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yea, it is those pushing for the no deal Brexit that are 'pushing hard for MPs to do something illegal'. Using an advisory referendum to dictate government policy, reneging on the Good Friday Agreement, airy fairy campaign promises (the two worst offenders for having made these are the head of the privy council and the PM: two men in the best positions to implement these unkept promises - but nope)... All of these things are at best of dubious legality.

So your hypothetical situation is what we are seeing now except the situation is flipped and the condom is on the other cock.

You kind of evaded answering my question directly. But then you did answer it the way I suspected the relationship actually is. MP are servants of the centralized crown by law first and foremost. They can’t do illegal things. The crown has authority over them. That’s what they serve. Which is the opposite of what you originally said in previous posts.I think a certain relationship needs to be understood here. The law and integrity of the land and state comes first, always, for any healthy state. The preferences of the people come second. Survival comes before creativity and will. There is no creativity and will without surviving first. There is no democracy to survive if these votes don’t count. On a basic philosophical level, UK needs Brexit or it is philosophically doomed. Elitist intellectuals are already picking at the corpse. Stop it now. There needs to be integrity to something centralized. If I’ve ever seen an argument for something like the actual royal family stepping in, nows the time.

[Horza]

Fresh Brexit talks row as U.K. asks E.U. to keep its proposals secret.

The row was sparked by a British demand that the E.U.’s negotiating team treat a long-awaited cache of documents outlining the U.K.’s latest ideas as “Her Majesty’s government property”. Whitehall told the European commission team that the three “confidential” papers should not be distributed to delegates representing the 27 other member states.

Sources in Brussels said that in response the point was made forcefully to the British negotiating team that all proposals would need to be made available for the E.U.’s capitals to analyse for talks to progress.

[Thrombosis]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fresh Brexit talks row as U.K. asks E.U. to keep its proposals secret.

The row was sparked by a British demand that the E.U.’s negotiating team treat a long-awaited cache of documents outlining the U.K.’s latest ideas as “Her Majesty’s government property”. Whitehall told the European commission team that the three “confidential” papers should not be distributed to delegates representing the 27 other member states.

Sources in Brussels said that in response the point was made forcefully to the British negotiating team that all proposals would need to be made available for the E.U.’s capitals to analyse for talks to progress.

Unsurprisingly, the details have been leaked already. So much for the EU acting in good faith.

[feniin]

What part of Union don't you clowns understand? You don't negotiate with one party independently of the rest.