Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaanka
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it doesn't though. short of trust funds, $stupid can't fuck this up money, and parents arranging for someone else to manage their finances, you can barely keep old wealth in most of these peoples' hands. people who never worked for what they have tend not to value it. I was top 0.1%+ in my early 20's and although it wasn't inheritance or anything like that, I made some lucky moves and got rich very quickly doing almost nothing. I then proceeded to piss the majority of it away not working and playing video games until I ran out of money and had to work again.
|
my point is the ones that dont lose all their money, arnt lucky, they were calculated children of people who made smart decisions in life specifically to build wealth and maintain a family tradition that puts them at the advantage, that libtards think is just luck.
Its simple: If you have shitty parents, you are poor, if you are poor when you die and have kids, you are a shitty parent (unless) you raised your kids to not be jellous of the money others have. meaning wealth doesnt define parenting quality, but raising a kid whos poor but also wants equality as far as wealth and the conomy goes, then you raised a shitty kid and were a shitty parent.
Juris is poor and jellous, hence his posting, and therefor was raised by shitty parents that he secretly holds animosity towards becuse they didnt put him in a situation where he was upset about a scratch on the bottom of his $500,000 pool.
Im not saying you can get rich by having money, Im not saying you cant get rich by not having money, I am saying that if you raise your kids right, give them advantages then they have a better shot than someone who doesnt.
That isnt luck, that is a calculated decision.
09-09-2017, 10:37 PM
Linear Mode
