Face Diapers Don't Do Anything

[Gravydoo II]

What happened man? You had science on your side... Makes you look REALLY stupid, now. Seeing as how you didnt understand the paper in the first place. lol

I know shes such a fickle mistress. Always changing and making you look stupid in front of everyone lol.

[Baler]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[G13]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What happened man? You had science on your side... Makes you look REALLY stupid, now. Seeing as how you didnt understand the paper in the first place. lol

I know shes such a fickle mistress. Always changing and making you look stupid in front of everyone lol.

It's just censorship

Not Science

Where do the vast majority of Covid infections occur?

[cd288]

Lol this G13 dude is such a sad human being; still can’t just take the L and instead just rambles on to cover his embarrassment that he didn’t understand shit

[G13]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol this G13 dude is such a sad human being; still can’t just take the L and instead just rambles on to cover his embarrassment that he didn’t understand shit

Censorship isn't Science

[Ennewi]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_standards

The statement that something is "backed by science" tends to carry great weight because it implies a tested, evidence-based validity to the idea. Such assertions are often made in marketing a product, idea, or even a belief system, even if it hasn't actually been exposed to the rigors of science.

Pseudoscience has been defined as "claims presented so that they appear [to be] scientific even though they lack supporting evidence and plausibility."[3] Wikipedia is concerned[4] about pseudoscience because it has the potential to make Wikipedia less reliable if not presented properly. Wikipedia does sometimes allow pseudoscience to be presented as a social phenomenon, if it is notable. However, Wikipedia editors must be careful to clearly separate science from pseudoscience in articles and to explain the criteria for distinction. There is broad community support to not misrepresent science by painting pseudoscience as science.

When pseudoscience may be presented, it must be presented properly. Pseudoscience should always be accompanied by the corresponding scientific view, and should not obfuscate descriptions of relevant scientific evidence or the lack of scientific evidence. All the applicable opinions about pseudoscience should be described in proportion to their prominence, which in science and medicine related discussions is weighted to the majority view among experts in the field of scientific study. In the interest of describing topics fully, articles written about notable pseudoscientific concepts may require a fair amount of detail in the article about the topic, but care should be taken to clearly attribute the views of proponents without implying that such views are actually statements of fact. In contrast, less descriptive detail (or none at all) should be included in articles that are not strictly about a pseudoscience if the putatively relevant pseudoscience in question is of little or no notability.

[HalflingSpergand]

I'm throwing the baby out with the bathwater, science is over. Might have been some potential there but it's long gone

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Censorship isn't Science

You see how hes the victim in all this?? Those darn lefties got it out for him. They censored that shitty paper he didnt understand, just to make people like him look stupid. It was an international plot, and hes the victim of this horrible censorship. $20 says hes never been wrong, blames everyone else for his shit life, everyone is out to get him. "the government" is mean to him, too. Such a victim, poor baby. She needs her bottle.

[FatherSioux]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They dont care. You're not dealing with honest actors. These are bentham-science people. They will believe what they are told because it comes from an authority they worship, not because they understand it. They were told masks are not effective, they believe it. Nobody has EVER called republicans "the party of thinkers" or "rational". They will kick you from their party if you dont say "rape hands is still the president" ask liz cheney.

It's astounding to read this and realize you are accusing the right of the exact same thing they would accuse you of. Truly amazing.

From the retraction though

1. A broader review of existing scientific evidence clearly shows that approved masks with correct certification, and worn in compliance with guidelines, are an effective prevention of COVID-19 transmission.

No one is wearing N95s, no one is wearing them correctly, certainly not with certification?

Also keep in mind when you cling to your science that the New Sokal hoax is very much real and proves how compromised the term "science" has become. Math is racist to guys so there's that great contribution from the progressives.

New Sokal Hoax

[Gravydoo II]

So one thing happened, all science bad. Got it. How many fields does the word "science" cover?? A million fields of study? Two million?? Welp, that invalidates all of it. You're right. Yeah, thats bentham science. I said that the ENTIRE TIME. He's a bentham science man. "Peer review" does not mean this is gospel, from jesus christ, and it can never change. Plenty of websites, like bentham science, will publish your bullshit of science sounding nonsense for 800 bucks, and say its peer reviewed. G13 fell prey to a bentham-science bullshit paper. (they are a fraudulent peer review website.)

You see how that works? Welp, 20 papers ruined science. Its all fraud, now. Cause thats how it works. When you find a counterfeit dollar, you throw away ALL your money. Cause thats smart and rational. There is simply no way ANYONE could determine those fake papers were fake and used to expose a fake organization, right? Not you, right?

Jesus this is news to you?? The bentham science case is over a decade old. Get with it. How did science survive for that decade while bentham science existed and you didnt know about it, now all the sudden, its a problem.