HBB was this you?

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No where in there does she use the word rape. Obviously he vomited all over her bathroom and took her purse.

oh shit. very good point. can't believe i overlooked it.

[Barkingturtle]

I'm an adult so I don't know: what is "MMT"?

I assumed it was short for Male-Male-Tranny, thus implying a gang-rape scenario and spurring the resulting conversation.

[Barkingturtle]

Massaged-My-Titties?

That ain't right either, fratboy.

[Samoht]

million metric tonnes

she's a fat chick?

[Massive Marc]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes.



The standard is that rape is usually (but not always) measured at the time of penetration. If you're about to get nasty and she passes out, she loses her ability to consent (previous consent is irrelevant), and any intercourse constitutes rape. You may have read a news story within the last 2-3 years about an old man who was going to be tried for sleeping with his comatose wife. This is because she was incapable of consent at the time and past grants of permission do not matter. In his case, she had consented (in her will IIRC), but that's irrelevant.

The only standard is whether or not the person is capable of consenting at that exact moment, and if they are not, it is rape. Note that a few specific exceptions and unusual circumstances exist such as what happens if a person passes out during a valid consensual encounter or the specific rules regarding spouses, but it can be complicated.

2 b honest, I didn't think anyone would bite. On the other hand this is good information for future endeavors.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes.



The standard is that rape is usually (but not always) measured at the time of penetration. If you're about to get nasty and she passes out, she loses her ability to consent (previous consent is irrelevant), and any intercourse constitutes rape. You may have read a news story within the last 2-3 years about an old man who was going to be tried for sleeping with his comatose wife. This is because she was incapable of consent at the time and past grants of permission do not matter. In his case, she had consented (in her will IIRC), but that's irrelevant.

The only standard is whether or not the person is capable of consenting at that exact moment, and if they are not, it is rape. Note that a few specific exceptions and unusual circumstances exist such as what happens if a person passes out during a valid consensual encounter or the specific rules regarding spouses, but it can be complicated.

You *****s never got morning mouth-hugs. Those are never unwelcome.

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No where in there does she use the word rape. Obviously he vomited all over her bathroom and took her purse.

So
Fucking
True
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Bardalicious]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's very important to reference HBB and Reddit in a thread where HBB hasn't posted anything from Reddit. Bardalicious doesn't bother being relevant to any thread. He plods through and repeats the same tired shit as the last time he vomited up his vapid commentary. As anonymous trolls go, he's super boring and lame.

Thanks for the critique of my trolling skills Alawen. We were all suspended at the edge of our seats waiting for another repulsively over-the-top attempt to sound intelligent on an internet forum.

If only your social skills in real life could match how much of an astute word-smith you've become over your years on the forums. Shit man, normally I'd be too fucking sympathetic to target someone that actually goes out of his way to post his real life here for some sort of pathetic validation that he apparently isn't getting outside of his internet fantasy world. For you, though, I'll make an exception.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No where in there does she use the word rape. Obviously he vomited all over her bathroom and took her purse.

finally someone with reading comprehension skills says something. barkingturtle i give the benefit of doubt to because that baby in the toilet was priceless. most of you throwing in personal bias and starting some bullshit thread that should have been aborted from post 1. i wonder how well y'alls listening skills are.

[Alawen]

OMG. A no-name troll on P99 RnF repeated his generic attempt to insult me. Heroin? Suicide? Whatever will become of me?!

[gotrocks]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your logic completely escapes me. There is no male testimony and no male to advocate for. The woman is an anonymous voice on the internet. It seems unlikely that she will ever even file charges. Yet somehow a chorus of hate needs to blame her for being raped and make excuses for his behavior.

I have not been referencing any general case. This is a specific instance. The statistics say what they say, and specious arguments will never counter evidence. Switching rapidly between a single instance and a general case introduces informal fallacies of hasty generalization and slothful induction. Seriously, try to think better.

I've never specifically referenced the case in the original post, but was instead replying to a lot of people's attitudes on here regarding rape, women, and men. I think we're sort of talking about two different things here.

To be honest I didn't even read the original case, I just read everyone's replies, and was clearly responding to that, and have been speaking in general this whole time.

If this post wasn't in reply to me, disregard everything i said just now.