Why is training allowed on p99 in veeshan's peak? (poll asking your opinion)

[Tasslehofp99]

Ok so its been previously established that training be allowed in veeshan's peak, but why? On live training was never allowed, even in."non csr" zones like veeshans peak.


"Non csr" did not mean training was allowed. In its current state veeshans peak is broken and.favors whichever guild has the most trainers available to them, or whichever.guild has the largest numbers. This is contradictory to what eq raiding should be at this point as dragons are very trivial with anything over 25 players seeing as they are all 32k hps.


So why is training allowed in VP? was there some reason this was put into place in the past? Also, if its allowed in VP then it should be allowed in planes of hate/fear/sky as those were put in the same non-csr category as VP. Here is a link to the eq rule book: http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=97723


So do you think this rule needs to be changed to more closely resemble the classic rule set"

Should training really be allowed in VP?

And if so then by whatever logic you base that opinion off of, shouldn't training be allowed in hatr and fear as well?


Looking to keep this discussion friendly and constructive, go to RNF and make a thread if you want to troll.

Thanks.

[Tasslehofp99]

Sry for typos, posted from cell phone and trying to edit is a bitch.

[Motec]

I vote no, because I am all for sharing, PNP and all that jazz.

[Tasslehofp99]

My opinion is if you somehow interpret "no csr" to mean anything goes, then you have to apply the same ruleset to other zones which were "no csr" on live.

Either way training was NEVER allowed on live, even in VP amd other no csr zones.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Either way training was NEVER allowed on live, even in VP amd other no csr zones.

Not true.

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not true.

Prove it.


Hahaha finally got to use that line when it was relevant.

[Heebo]

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Prove it.


Hahaha finally got to use that line when it was relevant.

But seriously - that's the second time you've used the word imput like it's a real word. Please stop.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Prove it.


Hahaha finally got to use that line when it was relevant.

No sir prove that it wasn't. You made the poll

[Nirgon]

It is allowed in Sleepers and VP

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is allowed in Sleepers and VP

Wut? Everything I've read indicates otherwise. Where is your proof?