Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Legalize Training on Red 1999?
Yes 70 68.63%
No U 32 31.37%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:32 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

^ something like this.

Guilds need to appoint a rep to just talk things out with Amelinda (or Nilbog whoever) and just put the rules in stone. And enforce them without discussion with the player.

Just instantly suspend them, tell them you know what you did. Period.

Frustration is a result of expectancy. When the expected is enforced, legit players will not be so upset.
  #12  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:32 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arillious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everything but the most obvious repetitive training should be allowed.
Dumbest fucking post possible.
  #13  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:35 PM
taakyn taakyn is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 200
Default

Harrison shut the Fuck up
  #14  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:47 PM
Knuckle Knuckle is offline
Planar Protector

Knuckle's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,712
Send a message via AIM to Knuckle
Default

training is dumb but id level up my necro if it was legal.
__________________
  #15  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:49 PM
Jabber Jabber is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am the Dumbest fucking poster possible.
fixed for you fatty
  #16  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:50 PM
Lulz Sect Lulz Sect is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: GuK
Posts: 714
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #17  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:56 PM
Billbike Billbike is offline
Sarnak

Billbike's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arillious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everything but the most obvious repetitive training should be allowed.
100% this
__________________
Greattaste, Halfling Druid
Last edited by Billbike; 02-22-2012 at 02:25 PM..
  #18  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:09 PM
Tassador Tassador is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,904
Default

Trains should be allowed as long as its obiviously not one dooche trying to constantly mess up a raid.
  #19  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:12 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassador [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Trains should be allowed as long as its obiviously not one dooche trying to constantly mess up a raid.
Almost dude.


Lemme know what you think the improvement of odds in PvP is with this scenario over the absence of it:

Guild (A) vs guild (B) fight is initiated by a monk (B) leading the charge and dumping FDed mobs.

After mobs sufficiently aggro team A, non-FD class members of B sit back and cautiously pick off fleeing players. FD classes of B go full aggression with no caution (cuz they don't hafta) and go around beating rezzers asses.

You tell me.
  #20  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:15 PM
moru moru is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 27
Default

Bring on the trains alrdy, cause it will happen anyway - whether its intentionally or unintentionally...
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.