Who lays claim?

[Rhalous]

Well, I am not aware of any rule that prohibits account sharing, so Wonton getting access to a druid account shouldn't raise any flags, imo.

I can tell you, however, that we all decided at a guild meeting about three weeks ago that having a raid force composed of different guilds is absolutely legit. I am pretty sure the OP was at the meeting, actually.

[Imsetta]

I'm really no one to say, but this just looks like you did a /who Dark to get a list of the DA people in the zone and then a /who Ing to get a list of the IB in the zone. A complete /who list would show DA and IB names mixed in with each other along with any completely anon players or unguilded players.

As I said though, I'm really no one to say. Just looks like a scam to look as if you did everything correct and to the rules when you really just want things to go your way.

Lanys_T`Vyl

[Senadin]

Well it make sense that if you wanted to know how many of a given guild were in the zone to lay claim that you would only do a /who *guild*?

At least it would make counting easier with a one glimpse rather than sorting out all the others? Especially if the zone has a lot of folks, different guilds and folks anon and whatnot. You cant really tell for sure whose part of the opposing force if they arent tagged folks.

At least that's seems logical to me?

[Kainzo]

Originally Posted by Imsetta [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm really no one to say, but this just looks like you did a /who Dark to get a list of the DA people in the zone and then a /who Ing to get a list of the IB in the zone. A complete /who list would show DA and IB names mixed in with each other along with any completely anon players or unguilded players.

As I said though, I'm really no one to say. Just looks like a scam to look as if you did everything correct and to the rules when you really just want things to go your way.

Lanys_T`Vyl

also, shouldn't this be in the flames / rants discussion?

Sounds more of a bitch about policy.

[Shrubwise]

Originally Posted by Wonton [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

DA trying to say that their "raid force" included members from outside their guild.

For those of you that don't know, and before you start spouting bullshit please listen. A raid force is 15 people(*see below). IF 2 guilds are camping a mob then its first come first serve. WHEN that 2nd guild shows up, if the first guild drops below 15 they forfeit their first shot. So you all please tell me what you think this SS means.

*This is where they gray area is.

It's gray because of this rule:
Q: What is a raid force?
A: For technicalities sake we will define a raid force as a gathering of 15+ people.

What is a gathering? in guild? out of guild? Can dark ascension hold a zone with 5 DA and 10 non tagged people?

Discuss?

So you all please tell me what you think this SS means.

I will tell you what I think this SS means:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think it means that you are playing on someone else's account? What does "taking over" a character mean?!?!

I think it is you sir who are breaking the rules here, so to act in a manner that the raiding guilds seem to do, here goes...

I'M TELLING MOMMY ON YOU!

[Tallenn]

Originally Posted by Shrubwise [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will tell you what I think this SS means:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think it means that you are playing on someone else's account? What does "taking over" a character mean?!?!

I think it is you sir who are breaking the rules here, so to act in a manner that the raiding guilds seem to do, here goes...

I'M TELLING MOMMY ON YOU!

I also noticed that the character who took the screenshot is Erana, but was posted by Wanton.

Not boxing are you? *gasp* that would be against the rules!

Then again, since it IS against the rules, it's probably not happening, right?

[Neno]

Originally Posted by Tallenn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I also noticed that the character who took the screenshot is Erana, but was posted by Wanton.

Not boxing are you? *gasp* that would be against the rules!

Then again, since it IS against the rules, it's probably not happening, right?

Not only is leveling hard but so is attaching an image. Wonton is obviously the brains of this operation and therefor was entrusted with the task of clicking Insert Image.

[Bones]

Originally Posted by Tallenn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I also noticed that the character who took the screenshot is Erana, but was posted by Wanton.

Not boxing are you? *gasp* that would be against the rules!

Then again, since it IS against the rules, it's probably not happening, right?

Didn't even notice that.

[guineapig]

What bugs me is that the OP seems to conveniently neglect to mention the conversation he had with DA and the fact that the raid party in question included 14 DA and only 2 non-DA.

Instead he uses a hypothetical situation like this:

Can dark ascension hold a zone with 5 DA and 10 non tagged people?

That's an attempt at misdirection, pure and simple.

[Kainzo]

That does sort of seem like account sharing is taking place here. Anyone have a lvl 50 paladin I can play?