Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-04-2011, 08:46 PM
mwatt mwatt is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 569
Default

Just a note on a Shaman enabling Ranger tanking up to low 50s...

Yes a Ranger could tank slowed mobs and be healed by a Shaman. If however, a Shaman must do both, he will run out of mana pretty easily (sans C2 or some other mana augmentation such as Bard or Necro). You'd have to control the rate of pull.
__________________
~ give me a large old school fantasy MMORPG, make it PVE, and hold the voice chat ~
  #22  
Old 10-04-2011, 09:19 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Bards, Rangers, Shamans, SK's, Pallies, Monks, and Warriors can all tank just fine.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #23  
Old 10-04-2011, 10:31 PM
Vondra Vondra is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 312
Default

Doesn't really matter much long as they're geared. In reality they're probably better tanks than monks (who also have the same exp penalty), do not as much damage but good enough...and have agro tools.

Hell in dungeons tanking is probably the best spot for a ranger if you're looking for their role in your group.
  #24  
Old 10-04-2011, 10:54 PM
Estu Estu is offline
Planar Protector

Estu's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vondra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Doesn't really matter much long as they're geared. In reality they're probably better tanks than monks (who also have the same exp penalty), do not as much damage but good enough...and have agro tools.

Hell in dungeons tanking is probably the best spot for a ranger if you're looking for their role in your group.
Monk penalty is lower:

Quote:
By Class:
Paladin / Shadowknight / Ranger / Bard -40%
Monk -20%
Wizard / Magician / Enchanter / Necromancer -10%
Rogue +9%
Warrior +10%
__________________
Member of <Divinity>
Estuk Flamebringer - 60 Gnomish Wizard | Kaam Armnibbler - 55 Ogre Shaman | Aftadae Roaminfingers - 54 Halfling Rogue
Aftadai Beardhammer - 50 Dwarven Cleric | Aftae Greenbottom - 49 Halfling Druid
Need a port or a rez? Hit me up on IRC!
  #25  
Old 10-05-2011, 12:53 AM
Vondra Vondra is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Estu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Monk penalty is lower:
Heh kinda funny.

All this time, even after seeing that list you posted like 200 times...I glossed over and assumed monk were 40% all this time, oh well.
  #26  
Old 10-05-2011, 01:05 AM
aresprophet aresprophet is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 370
Default

Iksar monks have a 44% penalty (1.2 x 1.2) which makes them slower than any race Ranger.
  #27  
Old 10-05-2011, 07:38 AM
visage visage is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 846
Default

yes
  #28  
Old 10-05-2011, 07:46 AM
Alkorin Alkorin is offline
Sarnak

Alkorin's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 268
Default

Never thought I would do this, but,

Quote:
Originally Posted by visage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yes
__________________
Alkorin Angainor <Evil Empire> - retired!
Formerly Alkorin / Crimsong of <Legacy of Steel> (The Nameless).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gratis View Post
Or you people could quit being children and stop treating minor issues as major infractions. There are tons of petitions coming in for reasons that can actually be resolved quickly and don't culminate in a message board brawl by a bunch of adults acting like brats.
  #29  
Old 10-05-2011, 10:44 AM
knottyb0y knottyb0y is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 289
Default

Basically Rangers do best in midsized groups where they can use their spells and abilities to fill holes. They have utility as a Tank, Puller, and DPS (obviously not the best at those but they can hang). In a small group their buffs are likely more useful (example their DS and hp buffs in a group with a Shaman as primary healer/buffer). In outdoor zones they make great pullers due to track, and in indoor zones track lets you keep an eye on pops and rare spawns. It seems to me a ranger is made for the 2-4 man group where having more than just one ability is greater than specializing in one thing. Whereas a group full of balanced non specialists would find less utility out of a ranger, but still a ranger would be able to offer DPS and offtank ability.
__________________
<~ Maleek * Necro * Project 1999 >< Gagresh * Warrior * Tallon Zek || Project 1999 ~>
  #30  
Old 10-05-2011, 11:22 AM
Juugox2 Juugox2 is offline
Sarnak

Juugox2's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 313
Default

sk or ranger? i have to say that sk is tanking dawgs but if the ranger had slows and we were siting there getting no xp... lol
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.