#5111
|
||||
|
Quote:
As far as the unevenness, sure, each person who joins can wait a year to get to that 'attendance % of loot' with /random if they want. I would still prefer to force it to immediately be as close as possible. And the short term unevenness is itself terrible even if it did even out eventually - imagine the instability of having to /random for how much you will be paid based on your salary. In the long term it would even out, but at any given time you might be very screwed or very lucky. Most people would prefer the certainty of a steady middle number than the highs and lows that /random brings. Generally I don't think we disagree. I think finding the perfect loot system is basically impossible or at least very difficult. It's not that people haven't bothered, a lot of thought goes into these systems and how each guild implements their own instance. It's just not easy to balance, and not easy to decide what to reward. But I'm not sure I buy your assertion that DKP is worse than random. You're welcome to demonstrate it if you care to by applying it to the actual structure of EQ and people's behavior, but I bet you'll find /random to be terrible in the more realistic non-ideal case, and DKP to be imperfect but OK when you do. | |||
|
#5112
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#5113
|
|||
|
what's this thread actually about?
| ||
|
#5114
|
|||
|
Lately it's mostly been about watching people get rustled over Ravager's defense of /ran. Or were you looking for an agenda?
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
| ||
|
#5117
|
|||
|
Did some raids last night at a designated time, got some Luclin pixels. 10/10 would raid Luclin again.
Also did some Kael raids, a pal warrior got KT boots, gloves, Vindi and Statue BPs. Many pixels acquired, was a good night.
__________________
| ||
|
#5118
|
|||
|
I read about soy last night and thought about the need for another great flood.
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
#5119
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Of course maybe the job analogy does work in that the people running things still have to pay their employees, even if they themselves take a loss on the job. That is, they pay them if they expect anyone to keep working for them. Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|