Quote:
Originally Posted by ergo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just posted a CURRENT post from alakhazam showing no level requirement on the ITEM itself.
|
It also shows two augs. Are you advocating that we should have augments?
Since you asked for it, here are more examples of the nonsense from your other post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
no epic has a level requirement on it.
|
I had
one of these on live. It clearly has a level requirement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a non-classic nerf to epics because rogues, as that is the only class is really affected.
|
Are you implying that people weren't MQing
Swiftwind onto ranger alts? Also, you seem to be in denial about the raw power people were getting from the stats on epic MQs, despite the fact that they could not click them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A rogue can backstab with it lv 5
|
No, they cannot
backstab until level 10.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The reason they did it has nothing to do with it being classic.
|
Can you prove this? Can you post any evidence whatsoever that proves beyond any doubt that epic quests were able to be completed before level 46?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If they wanted to make the quest undoable by a lv 1, sure I get that. Make the QUEST NPC not talk to you till 46 or eat the dagger if you arent lv 46+ and tried to turn in it, THAT would be classic.
|
Ok, but what do you do about ones that already exist? You don't seem to have thought this through very well.