WikiLeak Reveals SETH RICH ( DNC) MURDER Linked to HILLARY CLINTON

[Sidelle]

Holy-fucking-BOMBSHELL... [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-em...6082#efmAGSAH-

[AzzarTheGod]

Not said in reference to Seth Rich.

Next.

[R Flair]

Ya, but it does establish precedent and it also reveals that, contrary to this phony "everything is Russia" narrative they keep peddling, leakers are actually the problem.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ya, but it does establish precedent and it also reveals that, contrary to this phony "everything is Russia" narrative they keep peddling, leakers are actually the problem.

Fair enough.

[Csihar]

I am so sorry about this but English is only but second language. This may explain why I am not seeing anything about murder. From the context, especially the bolded part, it doesn't sound like murder at all. "suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it.".

Sounds very odd to even mention having basis for something or not when it comes to murdering someone. Makes a lot more sense if they're talking about non-lethal consequences for someone.

Again though, I don't comprehend English all that good [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ya, but it does establish precedent and it also reveals that, contrary to this phony "everything is Russia" narrative they keep peddling, leakers are actually the problem.

No it doesn't. The emails describe concern for what to do to limit the potential of a leak during the campaign, hiring prlcesses for the campaign, Hilary's meetings, and some strategizing on dealing with the press. They're not all there I'd say tho'. Jumping subjects a lot in it. Not a lengthy read.

[Xaanka]

e: better explanation vv


BUILD THE WALL MAGA DRAIN THE SWAMP
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am so sorry about this but English is only but second language. This may explain why I am not seeing anything about murder. From the context, especially the bolded part, it doesn't sound like murder at all. "suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it.".

Sounds very odd to even mention having basis for something or not when it comes to murdering someone. Makes a lot more sense if they're talking about non-lethal consequences for someone.

Again though, I don't comprehend English all that good [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The email suggests that the one who wrote it (John Podesta) may have conspired to murder ("make an example of") the "suspected leaker." It's not suggesting that the suspected leaked was a murderer. It is suggesting he may have been murdered by the one who wrote the email.

[Csihar]

^^
I get that that is the interpretation [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just don't get that information out of the e-mail. Of course it's easy to make it fit the narrative. DNC suspected of murdering leakers? Someone mentions making an example of leakers? BAM!

The way it's worded, actually says something else to me.

"We should kill that guy we suspect as a leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it".... that just doesn't gel in my ears (eyes?).

[Xaanka]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^^
"We should kill that guy we suspect as a leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it".... that just doesn't gel in my ears (eyes?).

that's literally what the email says. except switch "kill" for "teach a lesson" which is american english slang for killing or roughing up someone.

also he died not too long after this.