View Single Post
  #17  
Old 04-18-2014, 11:35 AM
Supaskillz Supaskillz is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,167
Default

It appears that the burden of proof is always on those saying current mechanic is wrong. I personally would like to see the burden of proof lay on the side of the abusive mechanic. Dispelling this rebuff is extremely op, I think we should have to see solid proof that it was this way at this point in timeline.

In addition it is quite difficult to prove such a mechanic did not exist if it did not. Would have to find someone post that they tried to dispel it but it did not work which seems unlikely.
Reply With Quote