It appears that the burden of proof is always on those saying current mechanic is wrong. I personally would like to see the burden of proof lay on the side of the abusive mechanic. Dispelling this rebuff is extremely op, I think we should have to see solid proof that it was this way at this point in timeline.
In addition it is quite difficult to prove such a mechanic did not exist if it did not. Would have to find someone post that they tried to dispel it but it did not work which seems unlikely.
| 
04-18-2014, 11:35 AM
Threaded Mode