skill-based pro-pickup raid nilbogcare system, or why should you get along

[nilbog]

-You may not engage a raid target with more than 40 players.

-Once your guild has killed raid npc 'X', your next engagement on that target must be attempted with 50% less players.

-If the raid npc remains up until 6 hours have passed, it becomes open to everyone again.

-If any of this is violated, [something really bad] happens.

Thoughts behind this:
-Zerg membership does not help; it hurts - the opposite of what we have now.

-Once a guild's engagement count ran low, there might be skill involved with fights.

-Eventually even the smallest guild or pick-up raid would get a shot at targets.


If left solely to me, this is the type of system that would be implemented. Good luck on agreements!

<3

[Derubael]

signed.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-You may not engage a raid target with more than 40 players.

-Once your guild has killed raid npc 'X', your next engagement on that target must be attempted with 50% less players.

-The raid npc will remain up until 6 hours have passed, in which case it becomes open to everyone again.

-If any of this is violated, [something really bad] happens.

Thoughts behind this:
-Zerg membership does not help; it hurts - the opposite of what we have now.

-Once a guild's engagement count ran low, there might be skill involved with fights.

-Eventually even the smallest guild or pick-up raid would get a shot at targets.


If left solely to me, this is the type of system that would be implemented. Good luck on agreements!

<3

No reason to dirty your hands, Lord Nilbog, I have this under control.

[Erasong]

i really really like this actually.

[Lune]

My name is Lune, my opinion matters, and I support Nilbogcare

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-You may not engage a raid target with more than 40 players.

-Once your guild has killed raid npc 'X', your next engagement on that target must be attempted with 50% less players.

-If the raid npc remains up until 6 hours have passed, it becomes open to everyone again.

-If any of this is violated, [something really bad] happens.

Thoughts behind this:
-Zerg membership does not help; it hurts - the opposite of what we have now.

-Once a guild's engagement count ran low, there might be skill involved with fights.

-Eventually even the smallest guild or pick-up raid would get a shot at targets.


If left solely to me, this is the type of system that would be implemented. Good luck on agreements!

<3

Am I right in assuming this would lead to a 40 -> 20 -> 10 -> 5 system? May have some epic VS's, lol.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-You may not engage a raid target with more than 40 players.

-Once your guild has killed raid npc 'X', your next engagement on that target must be attempted with 50% less players.

-If the raid npc remains up until 6 hours have passed, it becomes open to everyone again.

-If any of this is violated, [something really bad] happens.

Thoughts behind this:
-Zerg membership does not help; it hurts - the opposite of what we have now.

-Once a guild's engagement count ran low, there might be skill involved with fights.

-Eventually even the smallest guild or pick-up raid would get a shot at targets.


If left solely to me, this is the type of system that would be implemented. Good luck on agreements!

<3

So variance is introduced causing raid guild sizes to inflate for years... then you punish them for playing by staff created problems?

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So variance is introduced causing raid guild sizes to inflate for years... then you punish them for playing by staff created problems?

Cut the fat, thin is in!

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So variance is introduced causing raid guild sizes to inflate for years... then you punish them for playing by staff created problems?

Quit crying you baby, staff didn't create socking, players did.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quit crying you baby, staff didn't create socking, players did.

Socking is classic lol.