![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
4 lvl range, classic, implement immediately
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#12
|
||||
|
Quote:
Example If a 60 A is fighting 60 B and a level 45 heals 60 A then the level 45 becomes RED(killable) to the 60 B person. Then you could put in the 4 level pvp range and not have to worry about OOR healer problems. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#13
|
|||
|
I wish they'd make it 4 lvls and classic.
You guys are dispelling people with lvl 34 enchanter alts using a bug, I don't think I'll take your opinions seriously. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
0 oor healing exists. Unless hes scared of lvl 49 druids greater healing. Gheal OP.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
The answer to almost all problems is don't fucking level in unrest / sol a or b / guk.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#16
|
|||
|
Don't level in these zones because the lvl range isn't a static 4 levels. Got it!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
Hey, I've been saying how retarded FFA range is for months only to get lambasted by trolls and people who don't play here / don't understand server.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
Funny how the classic implementation was the good one. You know like the same whole team that designed this game came up with those rules.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#19
|
|||
|
The PvP resist system here is fucking atrocious, is there a disgruntled Sony/Verant programmer who has the code because even classic EQ with all its resist problems was waaaaaaaaaaaay better than this server.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#20
|
||||
|
Quote:
it had a lot of bugs in the first few implementations and he scrapped it and basically stopped working on red99 altogether at that point http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=50436 that thread is an example of one of the bugs and back before rogaine turned into ultrafaggot mode | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|