Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:28 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

Here's something to talk about.. I have also heard that CS would not involve themselves in any matters whatsoever within veeshan's peak on eqlive back in the day. I think even nilbog confirmed this. That would make for some interesting situations in VP if the guilds were to start training / kill stealing eachother. I'm not against that if that's how the players want it to be.

Disclaimer: This will not be the case unless/until I officially state it is. Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #2  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:32 PM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's something to talk about.. I have also heard that CS would not involve themselves in any matters whatsoever within veeshan's peak on eqlive back in the day. I think even nilbog confirmed this. That would make for some interesting situations in VP if the guilds were to start training / kill stealing eachother. I'm not against that if that's how the players want it to be.

Disclaimer: This will not be the case unless/until I officially state it is. Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
100 percent feel VP should have the "corpse rot" potential and CS should not involved themselves in it. Its one of the things that gamers across the globe reference as the ultimate in "hard core".

p99 needs this

edit: it may be the final thing that gets the squabbling guilds to settle down and make deals among themselves, if VP is turned into a CS-less deathtrap
  #3  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:36 PM
Gwence Gwence is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 561
Default

well I dont speak for anyone but myself really, but I think logging everything and fraps'ing and reporting everything is about as fucking gay as you can possibly get in a game.

I'm all about adapting to the situation and fighting fire with fire! There's quite a bit of strategy involved in raid setup when you going into it expecting some craziness to go down.
  #4  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:36 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's something to talk about.. I have also heard that CS would not involve themselves in any matters whatsoever within veeshan's peak on eqlive back in the day. I think even nilbog confirmed this. That would make for some interesting situations in VP if the guilds were to start training / kill stealing eachother. I'm not against that if that's how the players want it to be.

Disclaimer: This will not be the case unless/until I officially state it is. Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
do it
  #5  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:39 PM
Slathar Slathar is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,651
Default

Make it FFA. I'll buy a VP keyed character for 200k solely to train anyone who tries raiding there. Since it would be a no rules zone.
  #6  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:43 PM
Jomar Jomar is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
I say if you go with a full-on hands off approach, you need to unflag VP keys as soul bound as well, as part of the support staff's original intent with that approach was to make the zone as difficult as possible (I'm assuming VP keys are soul bound here).

The entertainment that you, nilbog, and the other developers could get out of this would be a small reward for all of the hard work you guys have put in on this server.
__________________
[60 Druid] Jomar (Halfling) <The Black Hand>
[60 Wizard] Astizen (Erudite) <The Black Hand>
  #7  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:48 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Default

I support CSR having no presence in VP regarding disputes or CR.
  #8  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:54 PM
Amelinda Amelinda is offline
VIP / Contributor

Amelinda's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Plane of Fear
Posts: 3,672
Send a message via AIM to Amelinda Send a message via Yahoo to Amelinda
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I support CSR having no presence in VP regarding disputes or CR.
__________________
.
  #9  
Old 10-21-2011, 04:05 PM
casdegere casdegere is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 263
Default

Well I highly disagree with allowing disgruntled people to just train others endlessly without worry of suspension. But considering who is in TMO and TR and how they have behaved...I really think they deserve it. In VP a raid can quickly turn into a lengthy mass CR.
__________________
"Death is certain, life is not."-Unknown
"When in doubt, burn it to the ground!"-Me
  #10  
Old 10-21-2011, 05:10 PM
Ames Ames is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Yawk City
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I support CSR having no presence in VP regarding disputes or CR.
Pleaseeee dooo itttt
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.