Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-13-2010, 03:52 AM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zs3000 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
IP bans work, and you can make excuses for why it won't, but it's the way to stop it. Period.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #62  
Old 07-13-2010, 04:15 AM
Volga Volga is offline
Aviak

Volga's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Even if there were, whats to prevent someone from continueing to create level 1 characters and training people?

I'm open to suggestions.
Just tossin a few ideas for chewing on.

Take zones like SolB, LGuk and auto port anyone under level 15 to the entrance of the parent zone?

or

Take zones like SolB, LGuk and tag pvp flag to anyone under level 15 who enters so that the present player base can nip the problem in the bud

or

Adopt a hard stance against disruptive behavior and put everyone on notice.. you have 30-days to change your password etc.. From that point on, any account connected with the disruptive behavior (disruptive behavior to be defined by staff) may given a 7-day suspension with higher time allotments for repeat offenders. This would apply to all accounts linked

and

by default block proxy connections to the game server with the ability to white list specific accounts who could apply for an exception.

Just ideas ...

V
  #63  
Old 07-13-2010, 04:54 AM
Gavmazterj Gavmazterj is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Volga, I feel as though I should report your post for presenting practical solutions to the issue at hand =D. I was wondering why after 60+ posts no one had brought up the idea of a pvp flag for low level characters in zones they have no business being in, so thank you. How difficult would it be to code that? Any thoughts, ye tireless trolls?
  #64  
Old 07-13-2010, 05:02 AM
h0tr0d (shaere) h0tr0d (shaere) is offline
Fire Giant

h0tr0d (shaere)'s Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 871
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #65  
Old 07-13-2010, 05:09 AM
Noleafclover Noleafclover is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 295
Default

Mmm.. but lv. 1 monk twinks come to solb and lguk for the idol and the code. And level 1 rogues and bards come to lguk for the mask. And carnal pauldrons. And possibly something called Painbringer or something that I'm not too familiar with. (last two solb)

I like the last two ideas, though, mister necro.

~Ennui - monk - WI
~Vita 38 cleric
  #66  
Old 07-13-2010, 05:13 AM
Uaellaen Uaellaen is offline
Planar Protector

Uaellaen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,161
Default

i used my rogue at lvl 13 to CR a efreeti group ...
__________________
[60 High Priest] Uuaellaen (Dark Elf)
[55 Conjurer] Uaellaen (Dark Elf)
[24 Rogue] Uaellaenn (Dark Elf) *retired*
  #67  
Old 07-13-2010, 05:14 AM
soup soup is offline
Sarnak

soup's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just tossin a few ideas for chewing on.

Take zones like SolB, LGuk and auto port anyone under level 15 to the entrance of the parent zone?

or

Take zones like SolB, LGuk and tag pvp flag to anyone under level 15 who enters so that the present player base can nip the problem in the bud

or

Adopt a hard stance against disruptive behavior and put everyone on notice.. you have 30-days to change your password etc.. From that point on, any account connected with the disruptive behavior (disruptive behavior to be defined by staff) may given a 7-day suspension with higher time allotments for repeat offenders. This would apply to all accounts linked

and

by default block proxy connections to the game server with the ability to white list specific accounts who could apply for an exception.

Just ideas ...

V
I think a great fix would be to make it so mobs in these dungeons can summon players who would con green to that mob. This way, you don't break any legitimate reason a low level might go there (friends letting you loot some no trade item, for example) but they would then just get instagibbed if they try to train.

Now, I have -no clue- if that would be an easy thing to code, or if it would require jumping through all kinds of programming hoops and be overly elaborate and not worth the effort.
  #68  
Old 07-13-2010, 11:21 AM
Arclanz Arclanz is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 284
Default

I'm all for creating a white list and requiring people email you for access; and ask them to fill out a dossier and everything. If someone wants to go through all that trouble to train someone, then at that point I'd say they earned the right to be a disruptive fk.
  #69  
Old 07-13-2010, 11:59 AM
fuji fuji is offline
Sarnak

fuji's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 252
Default

When I was about to leave EQ back in the day, at the age of 15 and didnt care about my account anymore I would train the shit out of stuff. The best is getting noob armor for your higher level then training that gnome in crushbone with the pet that casts root. I dont think there is a worse feeling then being a low level and getting owned while you cant move. Sometimes I would sit there and watch while they called for help.

I was a disturbed teenager sometimes.
  #70  
Old 07-13-2010, 12:06 PM
Overcast Overcast is offline
Sarnak

Overcast's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cincinnati OH Area
Posts: 375
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclanz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm all for creating a white list and requiring people email you for access; and ask them to fill out a dossier and everything. If someone wants to go through all that trouble to train someone, then at that point I'd say they earned the right to be a disruptive fk.
Or charge $5.00 a year for a forum account and require a forum account to play on P99..


That would then associate each account with a credit card # and address.

Could bans be done on card numbers / addresses then?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.